• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    an illegal immigrant makes it sound like the human being themselves is illegal

    No it doesn’t, that’s why the word “immigrant” is there, to describe what the illegal thing was. So, an illegal doctor is a doctor who doesn’t have a license. An illegal motorist is someone who is driving a car without a license. Nobody thinks that the human being is “illegal” whatever that means, it’s the immigration that was illegal.

    Literally the law they broke is on the same level as jay walking

    No, it’s not. Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking? Even a fine is extremely rare. Being in a country illegally is a more serious offense by a pretty large margin.

    However, I think you already understood that.

    I understood that some people trot out those terrible arguments, but I don’t think even they actually believe them.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nobody thinks that the human being is “illegal” whatever that means, it’s the immigration that was illegal.

      If you honestly think this, you’re not paying attention.

      Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking?

      What kind of argument is this? Jay walking and littering are on the same level, has a jay walker ever been forced to go back and pick up their litter? Cmon, you’re smart enough to understand that different crimes can be at the same level, and still have different punishments.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you honestly think this, you’re not paying attention.

        I’m aware that there is a lot of discrimination against immigrants, both illegal immigrants and legal immigrants. But, that discrimination isn’t caused by referring to them by an accurate term.

        What kind of argument is this?

        It’s a response to the stupid statement “Literally the law they broke is on the same level as jay walking”, which is clearly not true.

        has a jay walker ever been forced to go back and pick up their litter

        What does litter have to do with jay walking. Do you even understand what jay walking is?

        different crimes can be at the same level, and still have different punishments

        No… that’s what makes the “level” different. A crime that is punished more severely is at a more severe “level” than one that isn’t. Come on, this isn’t rocket surgery…

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh lordy.

          So the dehumanizing term should be used because it’s not the reason people are dehumanizing the people.

          Are you can fan of racial slurs by chance? Because “it’s just an accurate word for black people” is something racists say about certain words as well.

          What does litter have to do with jay walking.

          What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

          I’m simply using your own flawed logic. And you’re proving my point.

          How exactly is rectifying the law broken a harsher punishment? How would it make any sense to just charge them a fine and let them be on their way? That’s like saying you should just fine someone littering and then ignore the fact that they are continuing to actively litter.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            So the dehumanizing term

            It’s not a dehumanizing term. That’s ridiculous.

            What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

            Nothing. Is your brain mushy?

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Weird, because this was you up the chain a little:

              Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking?

              So which is it?

              It’s not a dehumanizing term. That’s ridiculous.

              The majority of the country disagrees.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                So which is it?

                It’s the same consistent thing: Jaywalking is not punished as severely as illegal immigration, because it’s not on the same “level”.

                The majority of the country disagrees.

                Which country, because definitely not the USA.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, it does. That’s the whole point of why it’s bad to use the word “illegal” as a noun to describe people. And that’s why people do so. Dehumanization. They’re not an illegal immigrant. They’re “an illegal”. Barely even a person.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the whole point of why it’s bad to use the word “illegal” as a noun

        We’re talking about using the word illegal as an adjective: “illegal immigrant”. Immigrant is a noun, illegal is an adjective.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      >No, it’s not. Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they’ve been caught jay walking? Even a fine is extremely rare. Being in a country illegally is a more serious offense by a pretty large margin.

      what makes you think anyone is in the country illegally? in america, people are entitle to a trial by a jury of their peers when they are accused of a crime. it looks to me like the accusation is just that, and you’ll forgive me if i don’t believe the government without proof.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        what makes you think anyone is in the country illegally?

        Do you understand what illegal immigration means?

        in america, people are entitle to a trial by a jury of their peers when they are accused of a crime

        Illegal street racers are members of the group who race cars illegally on the street. Any person accused of that crime deserves their day in court. But, that doesn’t change the fact that we know illegal street racing happens, and therefore there exist illegal street racers. Similarly, any individual person accused of illegal immigration deserves their day in court, but when referring to the group of people who have illegally immigrated into the US, “illegal immigrants” is a perfectly reasonable label.

        Unless you’re saying that you’re not convinced that anybody has ever violated immigration law, so “illegal immigration” is a myth?

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          >Unless you’re saying that you’re not convinced that anybody has ever violated immigration law, so “illegal immigration” is a myth?

          i haven’t seen compelling evidence about it. but i will say i think borders are immoral and i know my duty vis-a-vis immoral laws.