sebastiancarlos@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoAre Terminal Multiplexers a Fad?sebastiancarlos.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down117cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1-7arrow-down1external-linkAre Terminal Multiplexers a Fad?sebastiancarlos.comsebastiancarlos@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareNoodlez@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoOr maybe terminal emulation needs to be brought up to speed with modern computing. New terminal specs and all that. Nothing is better for remote computing and administration than a terminal. It’s far too data data dense for anything to be competitive. Nothing is better for quick and easy iteration of programming ideas than a quick text output in a terminal. It doesn’t need to be destroyed, it needs some iteration. It’s an old technology with a lot of cruft.
minus-squarePaX [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago Or maybe terminal emulation needs to be brought up to speed with modern computing. New terminal specs and all that. Yeah, I agree. I should have been more clear lol. See my other comment.
Or maybe terminal emulation needs to be brought up to speed with modern computing. New terminal specs and all that.
Nothing is better for remote computing and administration than a terminal. It’s far too data data dense for anything to be competitive.
Nothing is better for quick and easy iteration of programming ideas than a quick text output in a terminal.
It doesn’t need to be destroyed, it needs some iteration. It’s an old technology with a lot of cruft.
Yeah, I agree. I should have been more clear lol. See my other comment.