Internal emails highlight how an advertising company can use its in-house resources to oppose public policy proposals.

One of the world’s largest advertising firms is crafting a campaign to thwart a California bill intended to enhance people’s control over the data that companies collect on them.

According to emails obtained by POLITICO, the Interpublic Group is coordinating an effort against a bill that would make it easier for people to request that data brokers — firms that collect and sell personal information — delete their dossiers.

  • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Use sci-hub for paywalled research articles.

    Fascinating that smoking while pregnant and heavy metal poisoning can lead to psychopathy. I wonder if that 50% number is true for all humans.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think some of us have less of those genes.

      Going back to your original argument. If you don’t have a genetic tendency towards antisocial personality disorder, it’s less likely capitalism will make you callous.

      However, if you do have those genes, they’re more likely to express as antisocial in a culture like ours.

      So it’s both the individual biology and the environmental factors.

      I used to use sci-hub. I forgot about it today. A lot of stuff has become more available. I think studies done by or funded by the government are all open access now. I might be wrong though.

      I was trying to find a study they did on Netherlands criminals vs U.S. criminals. They found the former more rogueish and the later more callous. Could be genetic or environmental causes to this. Maybe Danish people are genetically less callous. Or maybe it’s the culture. Probably a combination of both.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How do we know that people with those genes who behave in a less/not-sociopathic way are not masking their intentions? Just because they don’t behave in a sociopathic way doesn’t mean they don’t potentially want to.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here’s one study if you want to take a look at it.

          https://sci-hub.st/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00279.x

          Bruno Verschuere is the researcher who did the comparison between U.S. and Netherlands prisoners. I can only find a reference to that study in an article though, and haven’t been able to find it published online. He seems to do a lot of research in this area (he’s one of the researchers in the linked article).

          Anyway the link should give you an idea on controls they’re using. The linked study is actually about lie detector tests and if they’re less accurate on antisocial people as they have less autonomic reaponse when lieing.

          They are hard to spot though. I did some time in prison for growing psilocybin. I wanted to believe my celley was a good person because he was easy to get along with and seemed kind. Looked him up when I got out, fucker had a taste for little girls and I had pictures of my young son up in our cell the whole time…

          But you can sorta learn to spot it. If you watch the documentary on the Nexium cult or other cult leaders you might see what I mean. They don’t seem to have the same fear response about hurting others and it’s visible in the eye movements.

          That’s my hot take at least. And I’ve been enjoying this conversation btw.