An exceptionally well explained rant that I find myself in total agreement with.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whether or not they’re violating the letter of the GPL is entirely separate from whether they’re violating its intent. The former is debatable but the latter is absolutely happening here.

    • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you think the intent of the GPL is though? Genuinely curious, this isn’t meant as a retort or anything.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        … the freedom to study, change, and redistribute the software you use.

        They are specifically and explicitly trying to limit your freedom with regards to redistribution by making it a violation of their EULA to do so.

        • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But the code is also available in CentOS Stream, which is basically the “git master” of RHEL, and that you can freely redistribute.