I would usually be sad to see another original RPG go 5e compatible but Neuroshima was infamously poorly designed ruleset, possibly worse than Shadowrun. I probably won’t be running it, but may steal statblocks for my 5e game if I need weird stuff again.

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    4513 days ago

    Seriously though why is there still coming 5e compatible stuff out after the OGL debacle?

      • @jjjalljs
        link
        1513 days ago

        I still think about an eye opening experience I had at a bar. Was chatting to some dude and he mentioned he was playing DND. I asked what edition. He didn’t know. He didn’t even know there were other editions. I can’t even guarantee he was actually playing DND and not some other RPG.

        There’s a whole lot of extremely… Casual? I guess casual is the word? Casual DND players.

        • @Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          1213 days ago

          It can be sorta easy to be casual if you have an extremely knowlgeable dm. I sorta started that way, session 0 and 1 just had him help us build our characters and run a 10 minute solo goblin ‘dungeon’ where he explained basic rules and possible actions. The moral of the story was that you can do other things beside kill npcs. Turns out if I had attempted to talk to the goblins or even explored the area I would have realized they were orphan goblin children, malnourished and afraid… Instead I slaughtered them all for no reward or reason. One hint was that non of them were armed and they always ran at my sight. Definitely stopped any murder hobo tendencies from developing. After that he did mention our rule book and linked me to read but he could have very well not and we would have chugged along fine. I prefer pathfinder now a days better.

        • @exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          When I first got into D&D I didn’t know what edition I was playing. I knew there were multiple editions, but I couldn’t find the edition number. The box just said Dungeons and Dragons.

          It was 4E, and I played multiple other systems before I finally got into 5E.

      • @TheGreatDarknessOP
        link
        513 days ago

        To be fair, even Neuroshima fans think this book only comes out to capitalize on Fallout show’s popularity, everyone sees it as a cashgrab.

    • @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1013 days ago

      The thing about D&D is that there is literally zero way WoTC can actually stop you from creating 5e content without their license. You’ll have a hell of a time publishing it, but there’s basically nothing they can so to stop you from just printing sheets or installing a dice bot on discord and getting to the races.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        713 days ago

        And they also dual-licensed most of the 5e SRD under Creative Commons as part of the “oh crap we didn’t expect everyone to be mad enough to actually hurt our bottom line” drawback from the OGL debacle.

      • @Archpawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        513 days ago

        Legally, they can’t keep you from publishing 5e content. You can even publish the 5e rules in their entirety so long as you change all the wording and pictures. I think they can keep you from publishing stuff involving their settings and characters, but you can still use their system.

        • @sirblastalot
          link
          29 days ago

          Legally, they can’t send the Pinkertons to rob you, either.

    • @Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      813 days ago

      Have you seen the installed customer base? An independent publisher would be extremely hard pressed to walk away from that.

      We have seen branching out since the OGL fiasco, though, which is nice. More system neutral or OSR versions of modules and statblocks, or multi-system statblocks.

    • GTG3000
      link
      fedilink
      17 days ago

      Because when you’ve got like 4 hours a week of free time to prepare for the game, grabbing something 5e compatible and ad-libbing parts you didn’t feel like preparing ahead of time is easier than learning a whole new system.

    • @CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Shadowruns actual rules aren’t so bad, character creation is crunchy but you could fit all the non matrix/spirits combat stuff onto maybe 2 sides of a single A4 sheet. The real problem is the editing, that information is spread across the entire rulebook so badly that sometimes it even feels like the information was cut off mid paragraph.

      • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Shadowrun is a “crunchy” game, this means it has a lot of rules, and those rules are not simple. If everyone actually learns the rules for their characters, and people don’t do things that are extremely odd, the game can run smoothly.

        IIRC from when I ran it, if someone does a normal melee attack (without any magic, hacking, or vehicle shenanigans), it’s like 20 steps, and some people can attack 6+ times per round at level 1.
        Compare this to a game where at attack is “roll one die, add one number to it. Is it higher than their armour? Then roll a different die and add one number to it. That’s the damage you deal”.

        Edit: Even those of us that love Shadowrun kinda hate Shadowrun. There was also a time when the guy in charge stole a bunch of money from the company, and they didn’t have the fund to pay the people who actually worked on their games.

        https://www.tgdmb.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=50989
        https://hackslashmaster.blogspot.com/search/label/Shadowrun

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          2113 days ago

          And the book is horrible. Want to throw a grenade? Let me check under grenades… No, not there. Let’s check under the throwing skills. Nope, no throwing rules for weapons. Well, maybe under attacks? No, that doesn’t have grenade throwing rules either.

          Oh look, here in a completely seperate section, contained in an unlisted sidebar, are the rules on grenade throwing.

          • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            513 days ago

            Or in some editions:

            • We just copy/pasted that table from the last edition, please ignore the third column.
            • Woops, we forgot to include that table. It’s the 90’s so we don’t really have a good way to getting the information to you.
            • Sorry, that book is only in German.
          • @Mirshe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            413 days ago

            Want to build an explosive? Here’s an equation you haven’t seen since 9th grade that determines how big an explosive you can build.

          • @sirblastalot
            link
            3
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Wait I found a reference to the page…and it’s not actually the right one.

        • @Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1513 days ago

          Add to that injury rules.

          Oh, you’ve been shot? It’s going to be nearly impossible to cast a spell or fight back. Maybe realistic but the number of characters I spent multiple hours making only to be wounded within moments of play was… greater than two.

          It has been a few decades.

  • Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    813 days ago

    Could you elaborate a little on the design issues?

    From Wikipedia it looks like you roll 3d20 looking for at least two successes, where the TN is a character attribute.

    I find success counting mechanics are much lower cognitive load at the table than adding up mechanics, plus there’s a sensible limit to the number of dice and players will always have the target number written on their character sheet.

    Plus that gives you a fairly clear 4 levels of success which is always easy to interpret as crit/pass/fail/crit fail.

    I personally don’t like using D20s but that core mechanic seems fairly smooth and elegant to me. Where does the physics degree part come in? Too many overly complex subsystems? Weird character creation?

    • @TheGreatDarknessOP
      link
      213 days ago

      The issue with the rolls arises when you have modifiers (like skills), which are in percentage, so you need to sum them up and then cover result and apply it to the roll. Oh and also, you apply Difficulty Levels to your relevant attribute, which are really weird. Easy is -2, Average is 0, Problematic is -2, but then Hard is -5, Damn Hard is -11 and Lucky is -15

      So in theory your action should be “roll 3d20, see if you have two successes under relevant attribute” but in practice it’s “add DL to your attribute. Sum up all the modifiers, then convert the sum to a percentage of 20.Roll 3d20. Apply the number you got to the roll results. If two or more results are equal or lesser than Attribute, you succeed, othertwise you fail”.

      And THEN you add complex rules for every single minutia thing on top of it. Or lack of rules for things that were deemed to important, because those were relegated to one of many, many expansions.

      Oh and in combat you instead roll a d20, and you need 3 different d20’s for 3 different phases of combat.

      And then you add the poorly organized book, sometimes contradicting itself (eg. you are supposed to fill a questionnaire to explain character’s concept and what they do BEFORE rolling dice in order for your attributes)

      • Hegar
        link
        fedilink
        313 days ago

        Dear god in heaven - I’m pretty sure that applying percentages to a d20 violates the geneva convention.

        Thanks for the horror story! What a cautionary take in how to destroy an otherwise serviceable core mechanic.

  • keepcarrot [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    513 days ago

    Part of me likes poring over lists of slightly different things with complex interactions, but for the most part I think such rules are a relic back when the design philosophy seemed to be “use these dice” and “the players might do it, there should be a rule and probably a roll”.

    Also SR5 having drug effects separate to the drug prices, among many other things. I really want to see a more nerdy SR vidya but that probably won’t happen

    • @lyricanna
      link
      713 days ago

      Its a system that does some things really well and some things very poorly, like every other TTRPG. Thus trying to force 5e to do things it was never meant to often either results in a bad experience overall, or basically not using the 5e rules at all.

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 days ago

      Where do you want to start? The player mechanics are way outdated and overcomplicated for what it wants to be, the GM mechanics are functionally nonexistant, the lore is cliched at best and still incredibly bigoted in many areas, the better adventures are just rehashes of 2e and 3.x adventures and still need entire communities dedicated to making them runnable, it’s unbalanced until you get to about level 10 at which point it becomes unplayable, and without pirating it’s incredibly expensive.
      Trying to strap every possible setting and mechanic onto a fantasy rule system was one of the issues 3.x ended up with, and 5e hasn’t been designed to solve that.

  • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    313 days ago

    I feel this as I am starting up Gamma World 1e. Looking at attack matrixes again has me drooling. I forgot why we went where we did.