Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWhat is an absurdity that has been normalized by society?message-squaremessage-square415fedilinkarrow-up1319arrow-down110
arrow-up1309arrow-down1message-squareWhat is an absurdity that has been normalized by society?Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square415fedilink
minus-squaredubyakay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year agoA government could be good. In theory: one year terms for elected individuals in public offices no second term getting elected is a random draw (akin to jury duty) based on the individuals’ capabilities authority limited in scope within city states I’m sure there’s other ideas regarding this.
minus-squaregnutrino@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago getting elected is a random draw (akin to jury duty) based on the individuals’ capabilities Who asseses people’s capabilities in this system? As they are likely the most powerful people.
minus-squaremonk@lemmy.unboiled.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWith 1 year and no second term they’re just gonna steal everything within their reach from day 1, so we need to balance it with: all public servants live under full transparency, 24/7 body cams etc for years after, financial transparency for life 2x to all prison sentences while serving a well-oiled practice to jail everyone who ain’t a total saint Then, maybe.
minus-squaredubyakay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’d need to be a system that automates itself instead of needing surveillance. Something that simply disincentivizes corruption.
minus-squaremonk@lemmy.unboiled.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHow about “if you accept the bribe, report it and do nothing, you can keep it”?
A government could be good. In theory:
I’m sure there’s other ideas regarding this.
Who asseses people’s capabilities in this system? As they are likely the most powerful people.
With 1 year and no second term they’re just gonna steal everything within their reach from day 1, so we need to balance it with:
Then, maybe.
It’d need to be a system that automates itself instead of needing surveillance. Something that simply disincentivizes corruption.
How about “if you accept the bribe, report it and do nothing, you can keep it”?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator