One of the things that sets Lemmy, and the collective fediverse apart from other platforms is its community. Recently, there’s been a large influx of new users (myself included; thus I apologize if this is not the right location for this post). A toxic trait associated with other platforms is the incorrect use of the downvote. Historically, this function was used to hide comments that detracted from the conversation; however, next to no one uses it as intended, and it’s primarily used as a I disagree with you button.

I don’t think we’ll ever change how the downvote is used now - it’s current use is too entrenched. Instead, I suggest that rather than just downvoting and moving on with something you disagree with, that users expand on why they disagree with the post or comment. Not only does this generate more content, but it also can take the conversation into new areas and offer new perspectives that the OP had not considered. You might even actually change a mind or two by doing so, thus bringing people around to see your side of the coin. Commenting (with civility) on stuff you don’t agree with is beneficial on all fronts. It promotes discussion, and it offers new perspectives. It also minimizes the likelihood of echo chambers forming. That last bit is what I’ve come to value here the most. Other sites are just massive echo chambers where there’s a rote response or opinion. This creates a stale environment for users, and deters people from commenting. Why comment, when you know what the answer will be, or that you’ll be jumped on at the first word of disagreement with the entrenched opinion?

But what if I don’t have time to comment to support my downvote? Simple - don’t downvote unless the item you’re downvoting truly detracts from the conversation (as per the functions original intent).

I realize this is a bit of a rant/ramble, but I think by actively putting more effort into our comments and downvotes, we can make lemmy an even richer community than it already is.

Thanks for taking the time to read,

  • Shovel
  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the thing though. If they downvote and move on, then they aren’t adding anything to the conversation. If they downvoted, and then said why, it would spur more discussion. That’s all I’m getting at in this post. By talking about differences in opinion with civility in mind, we avoid echo chambers and all the other negative shit that goes with it.

    • Scew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol, I tested this out live. Most people still like to ‘disagree button and run.’ I think it comes from the ‘debate me bro’ atmosphere that seemed prevalent on Reddit. A lot of folks would rather just show they disagree than expose their logic on why. This trend can then be manipulated by bots to strengthen the ‘unspoken disagreement’ with opinions that don’t jive with whatever agenda they’ve been created to support. And rather than talking out disagreements a lot of them devolved into ‘then just leave.’ Or even more venomously as ‘this community will be better when you’re gone.’ .

      • Xilly@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another contributing factor is that as we have seen in media, especially in politics, if you try to present evidence to contraindicate or provide a different perspective folks will just put their fingers in their ears and talk louder. It can be very exhausting and sometimes it is not worth the effort.

        • Scew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It can be very exhausting and sometimes it is not worth the effort

          Don’t forget to include the list of CounterargumentsTM that spews out after their fingers are safely in their ears.

          • Xilly@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The mental image this create just made me snort. Would make a fantastic political cartoon.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        think it comes from the ‘debate me bro’ atmosphere that seemed prevalent on Reddit

        Fuck, seriously, tell me about it. I hated that part of reddit so much. Pedantic narcissists.

        I agree with everything you said in your comment.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I once had some knob trying to argue to me that “god is real” because “the Incas believed the sun was a god, and the sun is real.”

          • everythingsucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This comment to me is a perfect example of something that doesn’t add anything to the conversation. But should I downvote it or ignore so it can possibly branches off into another conversation about “lol Christians” or something else?

        • Scew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who needs understanding when we can just spin everyone into cartoons?

    • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yah I definitely agree with your main point, just bringing up one other area where I see Lemmy working better. I actually really liked the way Slashdot used to do it, where it made you categorize why you were upvoting or downvoting (“interesting” “insightful” “offtopic”) etc. Obviously you weren’t required to fall into their categories, and you could still just downvote stuff you disagreed with, but it at least made it a little more explicit that you were ignoring the system’s intent when you did that. I know many reddit communities used their CSS to limit downvotes or pop up a little warning when you hovered over the button, trying to accomplish the same type of thing.

    • nepenthes@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I was appreciating here and on Lemmy-- instead of seeing downvotes, one was seeing replies.

      The large influx of users on the 1st don’t seem to be aware of the nuanced decorum on the Verse, but hopefully everyone will get on the same page soon :)