• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Right, and the one kid wasn’t disemboweled, they had spontaneous oopsy-doodles-guts-all-noodles, and the other wasn’t dismembered, they went red-rover-red-rover-your-limbs-are-all-over.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Disemboweling is disemboweling, dismemberment is dismemberment, neither one has any bearing on intent. Beheading implies the bombs were dropped at least in part to decapitate children, which there is zero evidence of. But again, I don’t think the intent distinction necessarily matters that much, given that Israel bombed an area where this was a foreseeable outcome.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I agree with you. Beheading means decapitation as a form of execution.

        At this point it’s really splitting hairs. The IDF literally has a program called “Where’s Daddy” that allows them to make sure suspects are at home with their families when they bomb them; so I think it’s safe to infer that they intend to kill at least some portion of children.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          But don’t worry, the IDF’s creepy ass program uses AI and then a human spends 20 seconds rubber stamping the kill order on a person and their family members.