• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No ones disagreeing with that.

    Fallout 3 was all around an inferior game. Not just an inferior fallout, but an inferior game, compared to 4.

    Mostly cause Fallout 3 was a disjointed mess.

    But just because Fallout 4 is better by comparison, Doesnt mean fallout 4 is good.

    I hate beets. But give me the choice between a bowl of shit and a bowl of beets, and put a gun to my head? I’ll eat the beets gladly and happily. Doesnt mean I love them.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Neither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn’t tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        because Fallout 3 is at least fallout-ish despite its horrible writing, story, and world building.

        4 is just a shooter game with Vault Tec and Super mutants thrown into it.