Basic blender went bad (motor ran but spindle wasn’t rotating). I wanted to disassemble to see if it could be repaired. Three of the four screws were Phillips head. I had to cut the casing open in order to discover why I couldn’t unscrew the fourth. It was a slotted spanner.

    • ThrowawaySobriquet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This right here. I bought their security bit set and, true, I’ve only ever opened the case three times in the few years I’ve had it, but in those three times nothing else would have worked without a more destructive solution

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Here’s the link, it’s helped me out a bunch of times in the 6-8 years I’ve had it.

        2 notes though

        • these are hard cheese grade metal. Don’t plan on removing any high torque, Rusty or partly stripped screws with them, they’ll either break or round off.
        • if the screw is too recesses down a narrow hole, these won’t help. The bit holders are too wide to fit in. I have a Honeywell Air Purifier with one security Torx that is 3-4” down a hole that this set failed me on.
  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The bit set and tool set from IFixIt has those. I’m not sponsored by them in any way, but I will shamelessly recommend their tools when I can because they’re objectively good for this kind of stuff.

  • lettruthout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s called an “H-type” head. I found some tools for that on eBay but was reluctant to spend any money on something I’d probably never need again, ever. But this video shows a hack using scissors.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA6_S9YkZEc

    I didn’t have a pair laying around that worked but the video inspired me to MacGyver my way to remove that aberration against all that’s good in humanity.

  • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just a basic security screw. It’s so kids (and people who don’t know enough about repairing appliances to know about security screws) don’t disassemble the dangerous machine.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the concern is that you would re-assemble it with the safety bypassed, not that you would harm yourself while disassembling the appliance.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Seriously. I’m not sure why people think it’s so dangerous. Unplug it and remove the blades. Its just a motor for God’s sake

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Though it should be noted this does raise the bar above most people, especially on a budget, single use tools are hardly ever worth it.

      Arguably more dangerous things have easier screws too, like electricity outlets

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Grinding a notch into a flathead screwdriver is annoying but it’ll still work fine as a flathead even afterwards. I would probably just grind the bulge out of the screw though.

        • lemmyhavesome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          In this case the screw was at the bottom of a narrow slot, and they only found it after breaking things.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            They didn’t find the screw by breaking the blender. They were able to reach it with a screwdriver before that, just not the right one. They broke it because they were too impatient to find a way to look into the hole and then find, make, or buy the right tool.

        • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can’t say personally any of my appliances have had this screw, so again relative to someone not doing this for a living it very well could be

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have a set of these that was part of a larger set of precision bits I was buying anyway. I’ve only ever used one of the security bits in like a decade of having them. I wouldn’t have bought the security bits alone.

          • Dultas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s more than some sockets or crescent wrenches I have from sets. I don’t know that I’ve ever used an 11mm of either.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Comon, do some reading:

      I had to cut the casing open in order to discover why I couldn’t unscrew the fourth.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Phone camera; $30 digital microscope; $30 Endoscope. There are just so many better ways available to look down a hole to see what’s at the bottom than to tear apart the space around it.

        Spanner bits are available in sets starting as little as $7. They are anything but “non-standard”.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Is that new blender going to help them fix other things around the house? $30 endoscope plus $8 screwdriver is still cheaper, and now they’ve broke the one blender, they’ve given themselves the excuse to just buy a new one anyways. Sure, applaud them for it, here of ald places.

  • Kevin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you have a Dremel, I bet you could take out the center bit and use a regular slotted screwdriver.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      $10 says it was recessed before op cut the base off, making it impossible without damage to slot the screw with a Dremel.

        • Nimrod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Damn, I didn’t even think of that. It would be ruining a good screwdriver, but you could just use an old worn flat-head drill bit.

          Good call, either way.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          👆

          Where’d you get such a big brain

          Edit - ah, since you can’t see the screw until you cut away at the product, the company is still going to frustrate even the crafty DIYers

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I had drill bits for such screws for decades, never had the reason to use them though. It’s nice to see that there’s a use for them after all!

    • noobnarski@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, the drill bit wont fit if the hole is too long and thin, so its not always quite that easy.

  • ysjet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Honestly, if you don’t have a set of security bits I would be concerned about you opening up a blender.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      honestly i’d be concerned about somebody without tools opening a blender. Why are they in there? How did they get in it? And what did the blender do to them?

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t even know that that screw type had its own name until I saw it in another comment, but the first thing I thought was to just do what you said.

      • fraksken@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Take a flat screwdriver and moubt it on a vice. Take your angle grinder, mount a disk for metal grinding. Grind away the middle of the flat screwdriver head. Done it before for the exact same purpose.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you haven’t already, look into getting a ratcheting screwdriver with replaceable bits, and a pack of various bits for it. Idk where I got it, but I’ve got all kinds of screwy bits (including the H-bit head) that I need very infrequently, but I’m always happy when I do and I already have it.

    I think the bit pack I got was for the security torx and it came with a bunch of other stuff.

    • an_onanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Really? It seems to me that if you believe blenders should be tamper-proof, you must believe that all appliances should be.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        A single tamper proof screw that all that’s required to remove is knowledge… Yes. Unfortunately stupid people try to do things they shouldn’t and that single screw removes an idiots ability to sue after they screw with things they know not.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          and that single screw removes an idiots ability to sue after they screw with things they know not.

          It’s not how it works…

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s exactly how it works and honestly this photo series is a pretty good illustration of why it works.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            There’s the way the world works and the way the world aught to work according to xyz.

            One is reality the other isn’t. Realistically if you don’t expect a security screw when taking apart dangerous electronics you probably shouldn’t be working on them.

            • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Personally to me I think we need to stop idiot proofing everything.

              I’m not saying remove all safety standards or warnings but we’ve gone too fuckin far to the point a complete moron has to be protected and treated like a child which just holds the rest of us back.

            • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The tamper proof screw is NOT there to protect you, It’s there to discourage repairs plain and simple. A warning label is more than adequate on other blenders, why not this one? In fact, there are plenty of dangerous devices I can think of that don’t need to be locked down to prevent lawsuits. A lawsuit would require negligence on the part of the manufacture and while you’re trying to say by not locking it down it could be considered negligence you’d be wrong. Otherwise I could quit my job and just file lawsuits all day. Let’s not try to defend these companies that engineer planned obsolescence into their products. All they want is to be the sole repair option (big profit margins) or have you buy a new over priced high markup item. Nevermind the waste generated by hrowing away perfectly good products that a simple easy repair would fix.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The tamper proof screw is NOT there to protect you, It’s there to discourage repairs plain and simple.

                Point to where I said it was there to protect you. It’s quite literally to avoid lawsuits putting the screw there implies it’s meant to be taken apart by a professional, not Ted down the street who stopped school in third grade.

                All they have to do is point to that screw and the lawsuit dies then and there no further action.

                It’s also not planned obsolescence in this case, it’s a barrier to repair. Literally a hoop too small to jump through that catches the dumbest of the well meaning. It would be planned obsolescence (arguably) if it prevented repair, it doesn’t it simply complicates it. It’s the same reason your seatbelt part ≈00 is held down by a large torx t50-60 and no longer a 15mm bolt.

                • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Madison, I’m not really sure what you’re argument is here. Let’s look at your seat belt argument. Torx (or star bits as they’re now called since Torx is a brand name) has become a ubiquitous standard in the automotive world and absolutely irrelevant to the poor point you’re trying to make. Auto makers use star bits because they enable a rounded dome shape that is smaller and requires no space around the bolt head to accommodate a thick socket. You may have assumed it was to prevent removal but no auto maker has ever declared that as a reason. Considering that even basic starter tool kits come with star bits these days I’d say that makes them a poor choice as a lawsuit prevention method. There are too many other “dangerous products” out there that don’t have silly screws and yet somehow are able to avoid frivolous lawsuits. I’m not sure why defending this practice is the hill your want to die on but making repairs difficult to avoid a lawsuit is something only a sucker would believe.

                • uis@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s quite literally to avoid lawsuits putting the screw there implies it’s meant to be taken apart by a professional, not Ted down the street who stopped school in third grade.

                  You got it so backwards…

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    ah yes a classic we call this a flathead, but without the part of the flathead that makes it good at not being a shit screw, but also it’s located now so the driver doesn’t slip out of the screw, so it’s actually kinda better than just a flathead screw, but it probably strips a lot easier than a flathead, since there’s a lot less surface area on it. Screw.

    edit: there’s a lot of people coping on this thread for some reason, bro it’s a blender, who cares, it’s like 20 dollars, 99% of the population is buying a new one anyway.

  • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The security bit is doing it’s job. If this is a barrier for someone, then they aren’t the kind of person who should be playing with the internals of a dangerous electronic device.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      a dangerous electronic device.

      i feel like if someone has the capability of bitching about a security screw on the internet, they probably have the intelligence to unplug a blender from the wall.

      If this is the standard for security screws, hex/torx will almost certainly do it’s job, but significantly better.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is the same person that had to smash open the device like a caveman banging rocks together. Posting a rant online instead of just buying a security bit isn’t a good second step either. OP may certainly be the exact type of person to keep out: bold enough to try to break open electronics, but stopped by a fairly standard security bit.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          but stopped by a fairly standard security bit.

          Did you read post. Before writing was best time, but second best is now.

          Here’s quote if you have eyesight like mine:

          I had to cut the casing open in order to discover why I couldn’t unscrew the fourth.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Which was discovered AS RESULT of cutting open.

              You are quite spammy, aren’t you?

              • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                No, the shaft was not uncovered as a result of cutting the thing open. They were able to reach the screw-head with a regular screw-driver, just not turn it. Says right there in the post.

                Learn to read, stop spamming people with your shit takes, and sure, let’s pretend replying to your copy-pasted bullshit with more copy-pasted bullshit is somehow worse. Anything to feed trolls like you.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          maybe caveman want motor out of blender, and screw is hinderance to motor collection. Don’t judge a mans cave by the lack of blenders. Judge it by the principles held within!

          Regardless, security bits are a skill issue, and i will not stand for them. They make cars with traditional bolts and nuts, those are perfectly accessible to the average person, yet people killing themselves with their bad car repairs, is disconcertingly low. They’re bad for repairability, they’re bad for the environment, and most importantly, they waste time and money for no fucking reason.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Seatbelts tend to be held in with Torx-head bolts. Right bicycle pedals have left-hand-threaded studs. Spanner-screws are a standard you’ll find drivers for in any good security or electronics/small-appliance repair set.

            Odds aren’t that far off that this screw was chosen for their blenders decades ago when this screw-driver was more common, and this one part was never updated as the design … “evolved”.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              i’ve got no problems with torx (it’s one of the best driver designs) and nothing wrong with left hand thread, as you said, it’s needed for bicycles, but using proprietary “security” bits is just, less than acceptable in the modern day and age.

              Though i am inclined to agree with you on the design theory, it’s more than likely they have billions of those little proprietary things kicking around in a warehouse, and there’s just no reason for them to get rid of them.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Buy a security bitset! It is surprisingly handly to have around. Sometimes, I’ve needed a certain screw size that they don’t have in imperial, but they do have in metric at the hardware store. But it’s a security bit only.

    They also work on regular, non security bits in a pinch.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Comon, do some reading:

      I had to cut the casing open in order to discover why I couldn’t unscrew the fourth.

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Phone camera; $30 digital microscope; $30 Endoscope. There are just so many better ways available to look down a hole to see what’s at the bottom than to tear apart the space around it.

        Spanner bits are available in sets starting as little as $7. They are anything but “non-standard”.

  • Remy Rose@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My library has a lendable “Ultimate Screwdriver Kit” that has every bit size and type I’ve ever heard of, security Torx, pentalobe, oval, gamebit, spanner, etc etc. Also a bunch of different styles of bit holder, and a bunch of attachments like angle adapters, depth setters, torque limiters, etc. Only tangentially relevant I guess… but if you run into a problem like this again, check your local library to potentially avoid having to buy obscure bits online!