• Xariphon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously. 5e is already a watered-down, anemic shadow of what 3.5 was… and this is too complex?

      • TheGreatDarknessOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being less complex than 3.5 isn’t indicator of being simple, that bar is on the floor.

        • Xariphon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say there are plenty of systems that fail at being less complex than 3.5. If I never have to do GURPS math again, for instance…

    • Dice
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the complexity. It’s the bloat, terrible interactions and game dynamics. 3.5 didn’t suffer from gm burn out, but 5e does. Because 5e is a bigger mess.

      • TheGreatDarknessOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not on 3.5 per se, but I had years long GM burnout after running my first Pathfinder 1e campaign. Bad memories from it were what actually kept me from giving Pathfinder 2e a chance for a long time.