• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m under no illusions that Linux is a viable alternative for everyone, but if you’re just using your computer as a web terminal and light gaming system, a decent Linux system + Steam makes for a very usable option these days.

    I have exactly one computer in my house that has Windows on it. It was provided by my employer, and I turn it on maybe once every two weeks or so, for special-purpose activities that can’t be done on my Linux laptop. And most of the time, for most activities my Linux laptop is the clearly superior performer - it’s not even close, despite their similar hardware specs.

    I don’t think everyone should - or can - switch. But if you’ve got an old beater laptop gathering dust, try popping Ubuntu or something on it, see how it performs. See if it’s something you could legitimately switch to full or part time.

    • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is Linux still a good option for gaming if one were to not purchase games?

      • e-ratic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, you can either add the game as a non-steam game and force proton, or use Lutris or Bottles (with proton or other WINE runner). For repacks with installers, you can launch the setup.exe with Lutris or Bottles (install the game to ‘fake’ drive_c and move it), just make sure you include dependencies that require it (usually .net framework).

        Source: most of my steam library on my steam deck is plundered loot

        • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are also repackers like jc141 e LinuxRulez that also manage the dependencies and prefix for you. LinuxRulez also gives you appropriate Wine versions if needed

        • Pharceface@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to necro this thread, but lets say someone I know has gotten copy of a repack and when they try to install it with Lutris it says they don’t have enough disk space to run the installer, is it possible to create the wine bottle and specify the size of it before launching the installer?

          • e-ratic@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you installing it to the C drive? There’s directory called drive_c, which will look like a windows C drive.

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lutris is good for that. It can be confusing at first if you don’t know how Wine works, but it’s very easy to use and doesn’t require Steam.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find Bottles it’s less confusing than Lutris, (though it’s not UX perfect), and a better suggestion for people starting off with gaming.

          Though Steam is the number one suggestion. If all your games run through Steam then you don’t even need to worry about Bottles or Lutris.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Steam doesn’t do anything

        You can just as easily use Wine/Proton as your runner as you can set up Steam to use Wine/Proton as your runner

        • beatle@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not true, steam makes it incredibly easy. Install steam, tick compatibility option, install, click green play button.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lutris makes it incredibly easy. Install Lutris, tick runner option, install, click play button

            • beatle@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lutris is great, I use it myself.

              However, if you have a friend fresh from Windows who already uses steam and you say, tick compatible proton 8 or latest and click play vs install new software and then add the game you’ve already lost the easy battle.

      • Zpiritual@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. I’ve run several modern … repurposed… games and it usually works through lutris.

          • L_Acacia@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think that for most people linux is the most simple OS to use, switched my parents and sister computer to Linux Mint and they don’t ask me to help them with windows changing their browser or moving their icons every two weeks. Though if you are trying to do anything more than web browsing, document editing and listening to music, you will have to learn how some of the os works.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point in time, I only occasionally have mild issues with newest games, because Wine is a continuously developed software, and games with an annoying anticheat, such as Destiny 2 or R6 Siege. Everything else just runs, including older games, that don’t even run on Windows, or titles you had to sail the seas for

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a gamer. I’ve used Windows since the 95 days. I’m done with Microsoft. I was not happy with Windows 10 and the bullshit they introduced but there is no way in hell I’m signing up for Win11.

      Steam has made a lot of progress with Proton. My next computer will be Linux-based.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s getting pretty easy to ditch Windows these days. Microsoft got too greedy and desperate, and actually using the damn platform they built is getting harder and harder, especially if you don’t want the nagging and annoyances that come from them trying to turn your computer into their subscription revenue stream. My impression is that Valve is aware of the problem, and wants to make sure that their store works regardless of which operating system you prefer.

      • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ll be just fine. So long as they fix the issues with anticheat software at some point. Gaming on linux is great these days in most cases though.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is so true. I have a gaming laptop with Linux on it and a steam deck. If it doesn’t run on Linux, I don’t buy it. The problem is that strategy isn’t really saving me any money these days.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a real sense of relief whenever I close my (work) windows laptop and open my personal Pop_OS laptop… and then start up Baldur’s Gate.

      I’ve been primarily a Linux user for several years now and it seems like Windows is just getting worse and worse in terms of user experience. I fear the day that my company wants everyone to move to Win11.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Give me GOG Galaxy and Path of Exile on Linux and I would install it now. Last time I wanted to switch, I installed everything I needed, went to download GOG and remembered why I switch back last time. :(

      • Veloxization@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t need GOG Galaxy. I play my GOG games through Heroic Games Launcher on my Artix Linux system.

        Path of Exile is rated Gold on ProtonDB and according to reports works out of the box through Steam Proton.

          • Veloxization@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t view my achievements so I don’t know. I assume no because there’s no overlay. I actually forgot GOG even had achievements. I just don’t care about them that much usually.

            Steam achievements work normally, of course.

            • uranibaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess it doesn’t really matter anymore since I have what I need but Dead Cells requires a connection to their servers (which requires GOG connection if on GOG version) to get the three items from daily challenges.

      • rootzreggae@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t tried installing gog but I do play path of exile on Linux, with a controller. Flawless ( my distro off choice is nobara)

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna ride out Windows 10 since I’ve got it behaving and I’m lazy. But if Windows 12 is just like Windows 11, or worse, I’m switching to Linux and figuring out how to get a vGPU VM up and running for when I have to run something on Windows for one reason or another. I messed with a vGPU in Hyper-V on Windows and was amazed by how seamless the performance was compared to other VM GPU acceleration options. I found a project to do something similar on Linux, so I’m gonna mess with that. If I can get it running as well as I’ve seen in some videos, I won’t need a bare metal Windows install anymore.

    • Mnmalst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @kescusay Just out of interest, what are the “special-purpose activities that can’t be done on my Linux laptop” if you don’t mind sharing?

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Running AAA games with kernel level anti-cheat (aka malware) would be an example. Or special-purpose Windows-exclusive software like some ERP client, specific hardware drivers etc.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, there are a few work-specific tasks that require our Windows-only VPN client in order to perform them. Fortunately, the bulk of my job isn’t like that.

    • ebits21@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you can put windows in a virtual machine for edge cases for most use cases. Use Linux for everything else.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux needs a Chrome OS type thing but FOSS with steam and it’ll be the best version for most users, and if it’s configurable unlike Chrome OS it’ll even serve power users

      (Chrome OS was actually really good imo, especially with their container method of running Android and Linux apps, but they moved it to VM, and it’s not as good functionally for some reason)

      • Mio@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know there is a Chromium OS out there that is not only for Chrome OS computers. I don’t remember the exact name, Google it.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chromium OS is the worst of both worlds (limited to chromium and you don’t get the ease of use from Chrome OS), unless you meant a fork of it, in which case I’m not aware of it and a Google search doesn’t give me any good results.

          (Though I still should have remembered chromium OS, but that’s on me being used to it being ignored because of lacking Android apps mainly)

    • bisq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would switch tomorrow if I didn’t play competitive CS that requires third-party anti-cheat like Faceit/ ESEA.

    • supercriticalcheese@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For most things I fully agree, unless it’s for windows specific applications that don’t exist in other platforms.

      What about Nvidia drivers for games?

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nvidia drivers work fine, they always have (I’m using a 4090 on my fedora workstation). This is a common misconception.

        Nvidia’s drivers are a problem because they are not open source. This creates headaches for developers and the community at large. But for end users, they work just fine. Nvidia doesn’t just dump untested code on the internet and call it a day, they have full time staff dedicated to building and testing linux drivers.

        One recent problem is that the current latest driver is not compatible with Starfield. This is a common occurrence even on windows, and is why Nvidia and AMD regularly release “game ready” drivers before a major game launch. On Windows, Starfield crashed with the latest AMD driver for the same reason.

        Since it isn’t open source, our only option is to wait for Nvidia to release a new version. If it was open source, the community could fix the issue immediately without having to wait.

          • gamer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re doing a new build and aren’t scared of following (very) complicated tutorials, you should look for a motherboard/CPU combo that supports something called “IOMMU”. Not all hardware supports it, and it isn’t really advertised.

            Basically, that lets you run Windows in a VM with full GPU passthrough. Combined something like WinApps, and you have the ultimate PC that can run basically anything.

        • Madex@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          got a citation there bud? running a 4080 on endeavour OS and have same issue :(

          • gamer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you misinterpreted my comment. Starfield is currently broken, and we need to wait for a fix from Nvidia.

            • Madex@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah yeah sorry, when nvidia does when / how would I update driver, would it be a normal os update like yay -Syu I’m new and don’t understand it all yet

              • gamer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Depends on how you installed it, but most tutorials have you use the system package manager, so yes doing the typical pacman/apt/dnf/whatever update should do it.

                You can check your current driver version by running ‘nvidia-smi’ in a terminal.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One recent problem is that the current latest driver is not compatible with Starfield. This is a common occurrence even on windows, and is why Nvidia and AMD regularly release “game ready” drivers before a major game launch. On Windows, Starfield crashed with the latest AMD driver for the same reason.

          DX12 and Vulkan were supposed to fix all that, but apparently not.

          • gataloca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well it depends on your DE. If you run Gnome, you will probably be fine. If you run Plasma you can run into problems but supposedly Plasma 6.0 is going to release with full Wayland support at the end of this year (or beginning of next one) so lets hold our thumbs for that.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been using wayland via Plasma for at least a year now and it’s been rock-solid. Granted, I have an AMD card and KDE is NixOS’ primary DE.

              If you run Gnome you’ll run into compatibility issues as Gnome devs have a “our way or the highway” kind of attitude. Like steadfastly refusing to implement server-side decorations. They want to use CSD for their stuff, that’s not an issue, but it’s another issue to not allow random programs to say “hey, server, I don’t care about my decorations, paint something suitable”. Especially for programs like mpv which don’t have a toolkit that could do such a thing for them, and mpv is not going to start linking to qt or gtk just to draw a title bar.

            • kescusay@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m actually using Plasma, and while there are very intermittent issues, it works great for the overwhelming majority of the time. I’m looking forward to 6.0, but the current 5.x iterations are already a huge step up.

              • gataloca@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Personally it hasn’t worked well for me. Currently I can’t even use it since it crashes my system.

                • kescusay@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Which distro and video card(s) are you using? I’m on arch and my system uses one of those setups where there’s an Intel video chip in charge of the UI which offloads intensive graphics work to an Nvidia card.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        These days, they’re working fairly well (at least for me). I play some reasonably graphics-intensive games and they perform well. Not the really high-end stuff, but games like The Entropy Center, for example.

      • whileloop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably just down to less stuff running in the background using up CPU cycles. I can’t imagine it makes a huge difference, but more than nothing.

        • codanaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depending on the situation, it actually can make huge differences.  For instance, I built my computer in 2010 it’s 13yrs old now. it can’t run windows 11 and while it can run windows 10 it runs like complete shit. Start up would take forever even on a fresh install, half the time Windows freezes just trying to get to the desktop after a fresh reboot. at idle background processes from windows would leave me running over 50% CPU usage just idling and opening anything like Firefox and Discord at the same time would jump to 100% CPU usage.

          On Linux it runs just as good as the day I built it. Startup takes around 30 seconds and I can actually start working the moment I’m on the desktop, no freezing or waiting for background startup processes to finish. I currently at this moment have around 20 workspaces (aka virtual desktops) open across three monitors, within those work spaces is hundreds of tabs open in Firefox, simultaneously playing RuneScape and dwarf fortress. A bunch of terminals, SSH sessions, and other miscellaneous work stuff running. a ton of docker containers running, I also have both discord with a call going and Spotify playing in the background and I am setting at 30% CPU usage with the occasional spike to 50%. I can actually use my computer to do a ton of stuff and have power left over while windows would max out and freeze up just the start up, even on fresh installs. And it’s not just this one old computer, I can consistently see rather large performance differences going from Windows to Linux across the number of different computers. 

            • codanaut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m on Fedora 38 with I3 WM and a few kde apps, originally installed as 35 and just upgraded since. Before that was arch briefly and before that was debian.  I went with Fedora because I need my computer to work without issue when it’s time to work and on arch I spent more time tinkering and getting things working then actually working. I still think just plain Debian a solid choice and I use it on a lot of servers but as a desktop, I felt like I ran into a lot of outdated packages. With Fedora I’m getting up-to-date packages yet I have never had an update break the system.  I also prefer DNF and their repository over apt and deb files. It’s all just personal preference though. You just gotta try them all and see what you like!

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I appreciate you taking the time to describe why you chose Fedora; now I’m tempted to try it, lol. I’m downloading the 38 Budgie spin now and adding it to the list. (It’ll run like shit with apps until I upgrade the RAM on my Macbook, but the minimum hardware reqs are met and I can still look at it and see what it does out of the box.) Thanks!