• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yep. I was reading at a 6th grade level in 1st grade, and had advanced to university level comprehension by 5th grade. WTF was an “age appropriate book?”

    I’m pretty sure that those people would have been incensed, if they knew that I chose TLotR as my 1st grade book report. (This was in 1985, so while there was an animated movie, it didn’t cover the entire three books, so I had to read them.)

    • waz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I assumed age appropriate was regarding content not difficulty. It is still a weird thing to emphasize though.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        They undoubtedly wouldn’t approve of the content of some of the books I was reading back then either. I had already learned the extremely broad strokes around sex and reproduction by the first grade. My parents have a farm with livestock. I was also reading computer manuals learning how to be a greyhat, before the term even existed.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        It always strikes me regarding the mental gymnastics people engage in regarding consumption of entertainment. Violent video games*, even if it’s cartoon violence, tv and movies are everywhere. But people clutch their pearls if it’s in a book format. The world is ending if it’s sexual. Hell, Utah just banned Judy Blume books.

        *I’m not condemning video games, study after study has proven that violence in games doesn’t lead to violent behavior, just that we find violence in games acceptable vs people losing their shit over a girl getting her period in a book for YA’s.

        • waz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Technically only one Judy Bloom book, but your point still stands and I agree. It’s pretty bizarre.

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m extremely impressed that you were able to read and understand LotR at 7 years old. i read them at 15 and loved them, but definitely had trouble at the council of the elves etc

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I was one of those “gifted” kids. I’m not sure that it helped anything other than depression and anxiety, but I’m still here, watching as things get even stupider.

        I’m not cynical, you’re being silly.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        For me it’s just all the funny words for highly specific descriptors of particular types of terrain. But also, you can somehow still get such a vivid picture and follow the gist, even as you filter through all that, even if you don’t bother to look it up.

        “Along the left was an eylet flanked by a hithertop which flattened as they proceeded north through the shallow wolly, which rose into semi-steep clifftons…”

        (Yes I made all that up lol)

        Somehow even with my ADHD I’m having such a good time with it…because it’s so vivid, like Tolkien was actually there.

        • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          i love the extraneous detail SO MUCH… i also have ADHD and wrote stories in that way. you need to see it the way i see it! lol