• FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Something I heard in the photoshop VS ai argument is it makes an already existing process much faster and almost anyone can do it which increases the shear amount that one person or a group could make almost how a printing press made the production of books so much faster (if you’re in to history)

    I’m too tired to take a stance so I’m just sharing some arguments I’ve heard

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Making creating fake images even easier definitely isn’t great, I agree with you there, but it’s nothing that couldn’t already be done with Photoshop.

      I definitely don’t like the idea you can do this on your phone.

      • Bimbleby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly, it was already established that pictures from untrusted sources are to be disregarded unless they can be verified by trusted sources.

        It is basically how it has been forever with the written press: Just like everyone now has the capability to manipulate a picture. Everyone can write we are being invaded by aliens, but whether we should believe it is another thing.

        It might take some time for the general public to learn this, but it should be a focus area of general schooling within the area of source criticism.

    • gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      almost how a printing press made the production of books so much faster

      … and we all know that lead to 30 years of bloody war, btw