renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · vor 2 JahrenAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square132linkfedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down121cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · vor 2 Jahrenmessage-square132linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·vor 2 JahrenXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·vor 2 JahrenToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareSystemNeo@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·vor 2 JahrenUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.