Dyno [he/him]

  • Inmate of the TERF Island Megaprison
  • Abrasively communistic
  • You have nothing to lose but your gains
  • 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 10th, 2020

help-circle










  • was just thinking about it the other day - it is very much a lib’s interpretation of radicalism/anarchism/revolution, in that it’s portrayed as being ultimately ineffective and driven by great men rather than a mass movement; and is focused on optics rather than actual praxis, e.g. hacking the banks and ‘deleting’ public debt rather than redistributing wealth, forcing the corporate exec to burn a big pile of money rather than put it to use etc.


  • the character creation is kinda superfluous at this point, you can spend loads of time naming them, making a coat of arms etc. but in my experience it never comes up anywhere, nor does your leader character. there’s no real plot or politics to speak of, it’s just a medieval city simulator. there are some policies you can enact but the only impact is just ‘raise taxes = people sad’ and the like. maybe in future more stuff will be added but at the moment it’s not got anything i would consider problematic
    there are already mods to change things like character avatars so you could potentially just make whatever character portrait you like and put that in the game






  • I was thinking recently what it would be like if we replaced all aeroplanes with airships instead; like helium-filled zeppelins. If it meant saving the planet, surely everyone could tolerate a slower journey, after all, people used to spend days and weeks on ships travelling across the world.
    The only real obstacle to this is the system’s incessant need to extract as much of everyone’s labour power as possible, not just over the course of a work day, but over their entire lives, meaning that any reduction in speed of travel, for instance, is intolerable, as it results in ‘wasted time’ that is not actively being spent on exploitation.



  • In my own anecdotal experience, some people, consciously or otherwise, will continue to refer to trans people as ‘they’ after it’s been made apparent what their identity is.
    It could be inferred that they’re uncomfortable with stating a trans person’s identified gender because they don’t ‘believe it’, which implies their usage of they/them is not simply being overly cautious or polite but because they don’t want to acknowledge said identity.
    This would also apply to people using neopronouns too - refusing to use them essentially implies that you don’t believe in them and don’t acknowledge that person’s right to determine their own identity.