if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.

That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.

Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.

at that point youre just challenging your stomach for no reason

eh, you know what, fair enough!

way to shift blame

wtf

Russia fucking off out of Ukrainian territory is kind of the definition of Ukrainian victory in this war though?

oh wow I didn’t know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

deleted by creator

It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.

That does look a lot like eternit https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Eternit_2.jpg

What would be better though?
I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

Lol I can’t get past the german cookie-wall

I remember prematurely scoffing at this notion in regards to early formula 1

But with the context that the driver stuck out like this, and the cars were more likely than not to go up in flames in an accident, I’d say it might actually very well have been safer without.

But, yeah, it of course makes no sense in consumer cars.

Yup. Ergo, the original statement is not true in the general case. Outside of the EU, parmesan can be unspecific, but is still not specifically a word for the fake stuff.

Wrong

The English name parmesan is borrowed from French parmesan, earlier parmisan, in turn borrowed from Italian parmigiano. In French, it is first attested as a name for the cheese in 1414, and in English, in 1519.

–Wikipedia

While I’m completely disinterested in football, and I do think the craze is often more than a bit much, this is just overly reductionist. Does everything one cares about and finds fun/interesting necessarily need to have intrinsic value? I’d say no.