Why the fuck do the europeans think that they should be the ones to set the conditions for the ceasefire?

Here in Brazil it has been a very, very hot summer. Literally hitting 50°C on some street thermometers during a heat wave.

deleted by creator

I heard that about 1000 people fainted in that concert because they didn’t allow people to bring water bottles so they would buy overpriced water bottles in the venue (which is against the Consumer Defence Code in Brazil).

edit: and people did not buy the water bottles because nobody wants to pay, like, more than R$10,00 in a water bottle that costs a few cents if you just bring tap water from home (incredibly, in most of the state of São Paulo, where the show happened, tap water is completely safe as long as it is coming directly from the grid, and not from your home reservoir)

edit: also, in Santos (a coastal city near São Paulo), some street thermometers measured 50°C on saturday, as shown in the local news channel “A Tribuna” (The Tribune). The increase in temperature is probably due to the boiling hot asphalt of the streets.

Congratulations to both of you

“Only sith deal with absolutes”

-some old, senile man

Search “The long march chinese movie” on Youtube. You’ll find a few.

I watched a few minutes of one such movies, but the movie felt too different from what I am accustumed to so I stopped watching it.

???

The sources are linked in lemmygrad, but they are from outside lemmygrad.

Also, there is no neutral information in the world, all information has parts omitted (for many possible reasons), has parts that may be distorted because of the bias of the primary sources, or has other biases that you must take into account when reading it.

If you only read information from one side you will only get the biases of that side, and won’t be able to understand reality. Most principled communists who study history do not use only pro-communist sources, they actually use mostly anti-communist sources (because, guess what, most historians with resources to do research are american or western european, and literally can’t publish pro-soviet or pro-chinese books in well-acclaimed presses) and then they filter out most of the biases (but not all, because that is literally impossible) by using primary sources or translations of primary sources, in case the primary sources aren’t in a language they know.

I’m not saying you must read literal nazi books and take their word for it, for example. What I am saying is that if you want to research 19th century India, for example, you must read from at least most of the different perspectives, always questioning yourself about the sources like this:

1. Which biases does this source have?
2. How can these biases affect the information I am reading?
3. Which other perspectives can I use to understand this information?
4. Is this source reliable? (have they been caught lying?)

If you can’t even do this, you really won’t understand history.

Also, what is considered “neutral” at any point in time is what the ruling classes consider to be beneficial to them. If you could talk to the average white person of mid 19th century southern USA about slavery, they would tell you that news articles criticizing abolitionists and promoting slavery were “neutral”. The same applies to current times.

You do not know what fascism is. You do not know what communism is. Go read a book before you argue online, it is good for you.

I know that you did not read anything because of your mention of Tiananmen Square. You did not do any investigation on the subject nor did you read someone else’s investigation into the subject. You just took the propaganda as truth and ran with it.

If you want to actually learn about communism, fascism, the USSR, China, Tiananmen Square, etc. you can just use the search function of lemmygrad. You’ll find many resources to learn.

(or you can just continue helping the fascists by regurgitating propaganda, do whatever you want, I won’t force you)

Do you even know what you are talking about?

The USSR was a state controlled by the workers, while the Russian Federation is a state controlled by the russian capitalists.

Putin distorts the history of the USSR every time he speaks about it. He wants russians to think that Russia was “a glorious empire that almost beat the West”, not a country led by the working class that gave hope to billions of people worldwide.

I mean, Russia is fashy, but they are way less fashy than their enemies (The West).

edit: Also, this guy (Kings and Generals) is probably fash as well and is trying to make the West seem less fashy by exagerating Putin’s fashyness.

Is anybody gonna tell him who stopped the nazis?

BREAKING NEWS:

Germany says that a literal Waffen-SS brigade wasn’t nazi.

Viva ao SUS!

(Long live the SUS! (Unified Health System))

They literally have cut a part of the interview with one of the protesters, exactly when she said that “parents should choose what to teach their children, even if it is…”, now, what was she going to say that they do not want us to hear?

edit: they even played the same clip twice just to show us that they don’t care that we know that they removed a part of the clip.

edit2: also, one of the interviewed people said called the counterprotestors “sodomites”.

edit3: one guy even said that “this is a christian nation, that is why you have freedom of speech” and said that “this is caused by sin”.

edit4: bruh, one guy complained that when he was in school students were expelled for “not complying with a trans student’s pronouns”. I mean, if you do racist stuff you get expelled, so why shouldn’t you be expelled for being transphobic? It is easy to use the right pronouns.

Electric carts go brrrrrrrrr

What the fuck…

Instead of admitting that China can make cheaper cars, they immediatly assume that it is because of subsidies (because they can’t belive that asians who aren’t “honorary whites” like the japanese can make good stuff that is also cheaper). Combining that with their support for real, authentic nazis in Ukraine, I think it is fair to call them nazis.

I do not know about what the guy on the picture said, but I do know that Putin visited New York after 9/11 to pay respects to the victims

“Freedom and Democracy”

-Says the most well-known monarchy in the world.