If your not both dogging it your not doing it right.

The joke is pup play

Iirc “fun it’s not a dog it’s a thing run”

Tfw you have a 12 core threadripper but most problems are single core procs

“corn” (or cō̆rn) meant any small seed or grain, like a grain of sand, salt, or cereal, deriving from a Proto-Germanic word for “small seed” (kurnam) and ultimately PIE ǵrh₂nóm. It was a general term for local cereal crops, so in England it meant wheat or barley, in Scotland oats, and later, when Europeans met maize in the Americas, they called it “corn” because it was the local grain.

Thats how corned beef got named, corns of salt.

Tbf most of the time you just had to clear ssd space and rebuild indices after restarting services as mostly the mail was there but stuck in queue

This is an amusing thread for me as my day job used to be unfucking postfix and exim servers daily for a fleet of vps and dedi boxes.

? I don’t think you grasp what is being discussed here.

I’m not saying that if you were burned by nuclear fire it would disipate away I’m saying that if you avoided being irradiated for the first few weeks after detonation you had avoided all of the fallout risk.

Speech to text is fickle ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

He’s not a pendant, he didn’t correct you or comment other than gentle advice, he’s a random observer.

Read a book or two on the subject matter please. There’s nothing to argue about. You are factually incorrect. I’m not being mean just explaining why you are incorrect and suggesting you enrich yourself.

With all respect no you were not correct.

It’s two completely different scenarios with different transmission vectors and risks

To put this in other terms you are conflating and misrepresenting facts either intentionally or unintentionally and it comes across as fear-mongering misinformation to those who have a more in depth grasp on radiology.

You’re more likely to be exposed to cancer-causing levels of radiation from a coa firedl power plant than any detonated nuclear device.

We knew what radium poisoning was for quite a while the question was would this work the same way.

Of the roughly 270k fatalities most were from the blunt force trauma (shockwave) and heat wave created by igniting the bombs not radiation. The lethal doses received at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were only possible during initial exposure when the immediate area was saturated by high energy particles. Radiation levels rapidly dropped and had returned to normal in a month on the ground.

Yep uncontrolled meltdown and the fires carried the hot particles up into the stratosphere to disperse.

Respectfully, I would ask you to read much further into this topic before dispersing your own opinions.

The Continental United States is far more radioactive than Japan is.

Imagine that you have a bathtub full of water and I dump a 5 lb bag of salt in it. The volume of salt in that tub has gone up by millions of percentage points. But if you take that same tub and dump it in a lake, the average salinity in the lake has gone up by less than 0.001%. . Tub is the Sea of Japan. The lake is the planetary ocean system. Given enough time as the two are connected, the “salinity” will equal out.

Keep in mind just because something is elevated does not mean that it is deadly. Depending on where you live in the world, you probably experience something between 2 to 3 mSv a year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation

Basically not a real issue. As both detonations were air bursts under 100kt anything bad was swept into the upper atmosphere and dispersed mostly over the Pacific. It did rain back down over years but in miniscule amounts world wide. In short any of those hot particles interacting with life is not great but the concentration and exposure period is what is actually bad. In short there was no fallout risk.

Building nations

Send me a key if you use it

Introducing the torment Nexus from the Syfy novel for the love of God. Please do not build the torment Nexus

Please elaborate on the back pain part