I always use a factor of 1200 as approximation e.g. 1GW produses 1.2 TWh per year but thats very very rough.
Die Rechtskonservativen und die Rechtsextremen ergo “die Rechten”.
Das Lied ist 2004 rausgekommen… Da hätt man noch recht chillig und recht billig alles in die richtigen Bahnen lenken können. Vielen Dank an die rechten Arschlöcher für die zerstörung unserer Lebensgrundlage.
Corruption
TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!1
Wir wissen alle was ihr macht…
Utility PV in Australia has a capacity factor of ~25%. So those six GW of PV will produce approximately the same amount of energy as the biggest nuclear reactor in Europe Olkiluoto 3 which took 18 years to build instead of 2.5.
It’s a few hours behind and they have obviously problems with behind the meter production. Adfitionally, the values for CO2 emisdions are off (i.e. nuclear is calculated with 5g/kWh, this is 1/3 to 1/10 of the values you find in literature) But all in all, you can see the trends of production and im- export.
While this is true, Austria has, for the first time ever, built more than 1GW of PV in 2022 and more than 2GW of PV in 2023. As a result 98%+ of electricity production have been renewable in April and this also holds true for Mai so far. All in all, good news.
Yeah, but they are…
Love EVs, hate Musk… not sure how to feel :-/
I am pretty sure the EU will soon reach the final phase of the electricity transition. Soon it will be more about balancing the grid with storage and upgrading the electricity network and no longer about build out rates of solar and Wind.
“Enlightened” centrism is not the answer…
Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.
Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there… The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.
I only accept data that supports my worldview is a nice argument. Have fun not learning stuff.
Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text
We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.
I am sorry, but reality says otherwise. And SMRs are vaporware, if ever realized likely more expensive than already expensive NPPs.
Slow, expensive, more carbon emissions than renewables. Either nuclear weapon proliferation or corruption, there is no other reason to build reactors…
Maybe you can get something out of here