Yes, you’re right. The only being who should teach the world’s children about anything is the omnipotent entity that we most definitely have. This entity is without bias, without error, and with perfect judgment. The rest of us are just humans, I guess we don’t get to decide what would help children and try to implement that. Apologies.

If you require more female attention I suggest you speak with your mother. I don’t owe you anything, and you keep pressing me for replies like you are owed something from me or anyone else. Goodbye.

I can’t help you. Maybe read a book.

Maybe you feel like girls and women owe you the labor that you are either too uneducated or lazy to obtain for yourself but even with owing you nothing, I gave you so much information you just don’t comprehend. I’m not a fan of wasting my time is all, so save the projection for the therapist you so desperately need.

Riiiight.

I should explain to you uniforms and why children are largely pictured wearing them? Goodbye.

No, I’m not explaining anything further to you. I’ve done enough free emotional labor for you and it’s now time for you to use your head.

This is what you’re saying to everyone else;

“Isn’t it weird how children wear clothes?”

No, it isn’t. There isn’t a trend for anyone apart from you, no one thinks that children in uniform is odd, no one feels like a creepy uncle looking at them. You’re asking others for an answer you can only give yourself. You should ask yourself why that bothers you and work through whatever is making you uncomfortable.

I think it’s weird to you, because you’re thinking unclean things. Children shouldn’t look like anything to you depending on their clothes. I’ll reiterate that you should address that within yourself; as there is nothing wrong with the picture or using pictures of boys and girls wearing their school uniforms.

Nice, they rather die in homogeneity than make the economy better, relax the cut throat customs and restrictions on expression of self. The replacement rate is already at a point of no return, but at least there are less halfus!

You didn’t answer the question, and instead focused on what you feel I’m assuming about you. There isn’t any need to assume; your view is pretty clear. I will answer your question. The picture of girls serves a purpose as they are the subject of the abuse, not only from their peers but from people who objectify them as well. Why would it be a better picture if they had pants on? Why does the length of their skirt matter to you? You mentioned in an earlier comment that musicians putting adults in school girl outfits was wrong. I agree, but you’re not capturing that the reason adult women are made to wear uniforms that are viewed as sexy have already sexualized by grown men. The reason the uniforms are SEEN as sexy is because young girls wear them, and an alarming amount of adults find that attractive, horrifically. You’re perpetuating that, because if you didn’t find anything sexual about short skirts, you wouldn’t have any comment about what pictures were used or not. If you’re not being hypocritical and ignorant; explain how that is.

Why is it so important for the pictures of girls wearing pants to be displayed for you? What is it that that would achieve in your world?

Now, now.

He belongs to us all.

I don’t know what you’re not understanding here. There isn’t anything inherently sexual about skirts, you see the image as ironic because you see the short skirts as a portrayal of indecency, in some way. If when you were a boy, you weren’t socialized to think that girls must look a certain way or maintain their purity, you wouldn’t find it ironic. The irony is there; just not the reason why you thought.

Stop sexualizing young girls.

Your view on how children; specifically girls should be portrayed is absolute proof you are sexualizing them. I’m sure there isn’t anything a little boy can wear for you to view it as improper, is there? You should work on that.

What world is it that you live in? Maybe trump didn’t want his daughters to become prostitutes, but that didn’t stop him and many other men with daughters to abuse children younger or the same age as their own daughters. Maybe if you spent some time in the real world, and less in a magical one; you could see that many things exist in it.

It’s almost like religion isn’t a good replacement for morals and personal values. Who could have imagined that?

I have no idea why you thought this was a good place to start a theological discussion; but this is about porn and young men. There isn’t anything magical about this, it’s actually one of the base, most human topics and young men have been talking about sex amongst themselves since language was put to use. I don’t see any place for you or anyone to inject dogma into it.

Clarity.

Even if it is born in you, not everything is meant to be shared.

Or, and hear me out- if you want to help people you can volunteer in your community which is understaffed and underfunded no matter where you are. (U.S and territories only, I’m sure that’s not the case in actual developed countries)

Sure but the comparison is insane when you get to queer eye. Mostly because it’s their job to give people a new style.