![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/3f2e920c-b602-44ea-9401-e006d4696a28.png)
![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/088f6b5e-f4d7-4860-95d9-e1f7728d3dd3.jpeg)
yea, especially to the detriment of the worker as well to either an early death or tons of health complications from overwork.
Death to America
yea, especially to the detriment of the worker as well to either an early death or tons of health complications from overwork.
except it one of the ways capitalists use to extract surplus. increasing the working day or in this increasing working hours, is a way to increase extracting surplus value, mainly absolute surplus value.
Okay! Well just remember every time you go saying that phrase, you’re pretty much saying fascist shit. Especially considering how OUN and Bandera were Nazi collaborators and liked to say that phrase. While at it, go read every atrocity Bandera and his ilk committed to! Just to point something else out to.
It was at the Warsaw trial that the OUN first started using the slogan “Slava Ukraini” publicly in combination with the Roman (Nazi) salute. Vira Svientsitska was the first to shout the slogan with salute in court as she was being dragged from the courtroom for refusing to testify in Polish. Bandera and Mykola Lebed would shout the slogan at their sentencing.
Maybe do some reading, like from that link! Or go double down on willful ignorance.
go fuck yourself. citing that fascist slogan
Would you rather just like, let those trying to villianize Hamas be successful? When Hamas are doing heroic things and doing things like fighting against genocide and being a major force against everything Israel doing? Like why should any ground be given to those who want to condemn Hamas? Fuck anyone trying to condemn Hamas
No, what kind of take is this? People shouldn’t concede ground to those trying to villianize Hamas, when Hamas is fighting against genocide. If anything Hamas needs more support
small business orders reminded me of like, this one part from Capital? just mainly like, that capitalist require a certain amount of exploitation just to like not work for themselves eventually?
but like this part!
From the treatment of the production of surplus-value, so far, it follows that not every sum of money, or of value, is at pleasure transformable into capital. To effect this transformation, in fact, a certain minimum of money or of exchange-value must be presupposed in the hands of the individual possessor of money or commodities. The minimum of variable capital is the cost price of a single labour-power, employed the whole year through, day in, day out, for the production of surplus-value. If this labourer were in possession of his own means of production, and were satisfied to live as a labourer, he need not work beyond the time necessary for the reproduction of his means of subsistence, say 8 hours a day. He would, besides, only require the means of production sufficient for 8 working-hours. The capitalist, on the other hand, who makes him do, besides these 8 hours, say 4 hours’ surplus-labour, requires an additional sum of money for furnishing the additional means of production. On our supposition, however, he would have to employ two labourers in order to live, on the surplus-value appropriated daily, as well as, and no better than a labourer, i.e., to be able to satisfy his necessary wants. In this case the mere maintenance of life would be the end of his production, not the increase of wealth; but this latter is implied in capitalist production. That he may live only twice as well as an ordinary labourer, and besides turn half of the surplus-value produced into capital, he would have to raise, with the number of labourers, the minimum of the capital advanced 8 times. Of course he can, like his labourer, take to work himself, participate directly in the process of production, but he is then only a hybrid between capitalist and labourer, a “small master.” A certain stage of capitalist production necessitates that the capitalist be able to devote the whole of the time during which he functions as a capitalist, i.e., as personified capital, to the appropriation and therefore control of the labour of others, and to the selling of the products of this labour…
aw, white striped freetail bats are so cute! and oh I can imagine fruitbats being noisy. esp. since they’re bigger than regular bats since they’re like megabats? but there also like the great flying fox? It’s neat their also around you as well!
It’s neat you hear them at least! There’s like hardly any bats where I’m at so it would be surprising to ever see or hear one. I’m sure they’re around here, somewhere
The orange/black/painted bat belongs to Vesper bats which are all really adorable and they tend to be small to! but not as small at the bumblebee bat, since the bumblebee bat the world smallest bat
Its either painted bats or kitti’s hog-nosed bat/bumblebee bat that are my favorite
They should have shown to have done stuff, like actually helping people or like doing things in the past that helped communities. Instead of just useless talk.
I learned about technical and organic composition of capital. Since I never heard of that before until like a few days ago, it’s really new to me
that’s kind of assholish
It would be cool if some of that was real, but I don’t have much reason to believe in some of it? But it would be cool if there was more to life. I really hate the idea that were all just like biological machine because it feels dehumanizing to reduce the entire human experience to that, and is really missing the trees for the forest or forest for the trees? I’m overthinking that phrase. Anyways like there a lot to being human and to being alive then just organ brain stuff.
deleted by creator
hexbear is generally nice to have, meanwhile the rest of the internet just feels very hostile. this website is probably the only place im social at to, since like in real life I have a lot of trouble speaking due to having trouble speaking/speech issues. and that is very isolating at times. also it just nice to just vent on here about stuff.