Luminous5481 [they/them]

Queer anarchist, avid sci-fi and fantasy fan, and enjoyer of locally run genAI. Always looking forward to learning new things.

I have direct messages turned off. If you need to contact me privately, you can do so over Matrix.

  • 0 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 8 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 23rd, 2025

help-circle


  • Not intercepting the PMs plane and arresting him for the ICC warrant is also illegal under international law. Israel can’t legally occupy the settlements that they do, that’s a violation of international law. They can’t bomb refugee camps, that’s a violation of international law. They can’t starve Palestinians intentionally, that’s against international law. They can’t refuse medical help to injured civilians or Hamas fighters who cannot fight anymore, that’s against international law.

    I’m assuming, as somebody quoting some random treaty to me, that you’re a liberal who views laws and legality as the order that holds our world together. It must come as a real shock to you that no state actually gives a shit about what’s legal, they only care about what they can get away with. Unless you can force your government to abide by a law, they can do whatever the fuck they want. That’s the neat thing about laws, they don’t mean shit unless the government in question decides to abide by them.




  • Honestly, fuck you you illiterate moron. If I’m a horrible person, you’re a damn idiot who can’t read. I am someone who actively wanted ICC prosecutions, who considered doing activism work supporting the ICC regarding this, but you know what? Fuck you, fuck this movement, fuck this instance, I don’t want to be treated this way, ban me, kick me out of the movement, keep your political movement nice and exclusive. I am way less likely to do anything regarding this movement at all, including supporting the ICC in any way. If I’m so horrible, then fuck you, I won’t advocate for ICC prosecutions or support this cause at all, apparently I’m not welcome and want genocide… that’s literally what I am saying, right?

    You were never going to “do anything for this movement” in the first place, so I don’t think anyone is going to miss you now that you’ve taken off the mask and shown your true colors.









  • Except your instance is federated and you do have to contend with me.

    yeah, I don’t really think that’s true, all things considered.

    I asked you an honest question and instead of answering it you avoided the question because you don’t want to contend with an honest debate

    I am not interested in debating whether or not I should associate with ethnocutural supremacists.

    I also don’t like your radical response to poor sources or arguments.

    first of all, I never asked what you do or do not like. nobody did. you’re not part of the flotilla, or one of the instances thinking of joining the flotilla. you shouldn’t even be here, since this thread is not for you and your voice is not recognized and will not be considered when the decision is made.

    my “poor arguments” are nothing more than arguments that you are either incapable or unwilling of understanding. likely the latter, since even a child is capable of love for each other.

    Represent yourself better and raise your own standards.

    my standards for association are clearly much higher than yours.



  • The real question should be do you want to be an echo chamber?

    an anarchist echo chamber? yes, please. I will not ever, at any time, under any circumstances, for any reason, for any person, even for a second, consider any ideology, opinion, or idea, that does not include solidarity for all mankind. I’m not interested in your “devils advocate”, or your debate, or your differing opinion. if it is not helping your fellow man and lifting people up, freeing them from oppression from religions and states, then I want nothing ever to do with it.

    you cannot change my mind.


  • So, let me ask clearly, do you think I am a Zionist?

    I do not care if you are. you’re not on our instance. we’re not being forced to associate with you. you probably thought you had some sort of “got you!” argument lined up. but I’m not concerned with whether or not some random .worlder supports genocide. this time tomorrow, I’ll have forgotten you exist.

    the only thing I’m doing here is making sure anyone else who wanders by does not see your absolutely wrong position and think being a zionist and an anarchist are anything but mutually exclusive ideologies.



  • Except I didn’t call you racist, I implied you followed the same ideology of racists.

    that was an attempt at clever wordplay that means absolutely nothing. you’re not good at this.

    You see people who are functionally the same as you

    nobody who is a zionist is “functionally the same as” anarchists. the two ideologies are diametrically opposed and cannot function together.

    You’ve taken someone who agrees with your ideals

    no zionist agrees with my ideals, or they would no be a zionist. you cannot agree with my ideals and support a racist genocidal apartheid regime.

    and ostracized them for not saying things the way you want.

    anarchists voluntarily associate into communities of like-minded individuals. this is a right that cannot be infringed upon. likewise, the right to disassociate from people who are not like-minded is also a right that cannot be infringed. they are a foundation of anarchist thought. any zionist is free to form their own associations of like-minded individuals. banning zioonism from our community does not infringe on their rights, nor impede them in any way from speech.