Don’t spread it around. It’s a complete fraud of a paper for all we know. Just the fact that it has convincing rebuttals is enough to make you consider it irrelevant.
- 4 Posts
- 565 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 4th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I remember reading this simply terrible article in Scientific American; the entire article was based on this research paper referred to the meme above.
The paper was a complete fraud, and people just guzzled the cool-aid. He’ll they still do, looking at this thread.
82·5 days agoI always wondered how much IGN is commissioned to write these nonsense articles for promotion.
161·17 days agoTry thousands. Most expensive ship runs you about 3000$
91·22 days agoNo but see, the issue is that you act like a cunt; therefore you are a cunt.
73·22 days agoGet a grip, dude.
3·22 days agoIt is sort of interesting that Bo, in a way, depicts his version of the Sacrifice of Isaac, otherwise a very popular reanissanse motive; the scene having been painted by Carvaggio, Rembrandt and Filippo Lippi.
5·23 days agoMm, is that why Silent Hill 2 sits on ‘Overmevmingly positive’ while still plagued by serious performance issues?
The statement is simply not true; gamers are willing to swallow just about anything if sold correctly.
71·28 days agoOk, I will try to consume less activated charcoal 🙄
1·1 month agoDear guy in the comments; please reply to me in ‘Rich White Man’.
I knew it, I fucking knew I recognized Vance from somewhere!
71·1 month agoThe issue started long before M formed the current right wing administration. He’ll, it started before even the last two S formed left wing administrations…
83·1 month agoNeedless to say, people don’t like you.
Heartwrenching stuff you got there, only it’s not what we’re discussing…
I really don’t think I did
So they’re well compensated, so what’s the problem you mean? They aren’t forced to accept it…
It’s every refugees dream to be able to go home to their country rebuilt and stable…
I was more thinking about a comparable monetary sum since it seems to be what you were critiquing.
Do you?
No, you’re thinking of philosophy. Philosophy is a discussion. Science is a process. Just the fact that they are being accused of being misleading and outright falsyfyiing evidence is enough to simply ignore their purported results until they can produce a paper that fixes all those problems.
It’s not a discussion whether we can agree on something. The evidence should do the only talking.