I like the part where the author completely ignores the devastation in Taiwan were a war to erupt over it.

😂🤡🤡

As someone who can’t read the language this is pretty fascinating, you should totally post more on this topic!

🤡🤡🤪🤪👻

How did they think having a pic of a child with a gun is a good look

😂

Unironically I think leftists need much much simpler explanations and summaries with examples so that 5 year olds can understand in order to radicalize more reactionaries. With a lot more pictures as well.

Not to mention because of the capitalist nature, companies that will be creating these new supply chains will charge exorbitant money for lackluster work leading to even more delays.

Libs are perfectly fine with fascism as long as the word Nazi isn’t used

As a billionaire I agree, instead of forming unity to take me down I much rather you idiots keep on suckling on my bullshit to keep the gravy train going. Keep licking my boots 👍👍👍👍

Temu gang let’s gooo. Imagine paying 10x more for products on Amazon that are just rebranded products from the same factories.

Why would you get downvoted for this, that’s the correct take

A frightening amount of reactionaries will unironically believe this

And yet china refuses to make policies that support billionaires and benefit the bourgeoisie class specifically, they instead do the opposite and fuck them over to the point where western media makes articles about how china is fucking over billionaires as if that’s a bad thing.

That’s what separates MLs from reactionaries and people like maoists who do not understand dialectical materialism and operates on idealism and being dogmatic.

If china really were revisionist they would be stripping social safety nets, reducing funding for public infrastructure, increasing privatization of everything that’s currently public and increasing policies favoring the bourgeoisie. Change happens in elliptical motion. For example when the USSR became revisionist they switched over real quick and policies favoring the proletariat were quickly stripped away in favor of pro bourgeoisie ones. The revisionists in powere immediately enriched themselves with this.

Maoists and reactionaries don’t look at objective material reality.

I have seen multiple redditors say this but unironically

Yeah and I am one of them and I do not like polymatter’s shitty anti china propagandist takes that has a slight positive rice paper wrapping around it. He doesn’t lead to better understanding and positive relations to China. For example his shitty Chinese efficiency video is full of misinformation and china bad takes on their hsr and the video is weaponized to attack china in that regard as well as his china collapse videos in the past.

Him throwing a few bones here and there does not make up for his propagandist takes and the fact that people think he is remotely accurate is concerning.

It’s like seeing Tucker Carlson going against some western propaganda points and going listen to this guy he’s saying some good shit.

I have no idea why you are obsessed with defending this procapitalist shitbag propagandist.

Polymatter is cringe

https://twitter.com/ardenthistorian/status/1665930120962486275?s=20 https://twitter.com/CornelWest/status/23848928873021440

Cornel West is antimarxist, is affiliated with Ron de Santos, and is pro Reagan

Replace the guy on the top left with a child with no dialogue spoken and it would also be pretty accurate

Found the lib