You should check out the song “Patches” If that’s what you’re interested in.

A Baker should be able to refuse to bake a cake he doesn’t want to make. He shouldn’t even have to give a reason. Anything less than that is by definition forced labor.

I don’t think it’s a smart decision. I think discriminating for any reason makes business sense nor will it win you any allies, but it should be legal. Anything less than that is the government forcing you to work.

Teams would be very offended if it could afford the spare CPU cycles to read your post.

You mean the non-heavily moderated platforms allow for discussion on topics you care about by people who disagree with you.

This sucks, but malicious compliance has also always been people’s head cannon fantasies. There’s zero chance that most of this situations went down as claimed. Bearing that in mind and with there being Jo karma to white on Lemmy, does it matter if they’re reposts?

The only real reason for every car on the road not to go hybrid is cost and cost isn’t a factor for Lamborghini. Hybrid drivetrains are the perfect answer to the Ice’s gross inefficiencies when at idle or lower speeds.

Liftoff is going well enough for me as well. Still miss RiF.

“This is why people on the left are so exasperated with centrists”

Are you suggesting that Macron is a centrist? Because I don’t follow.

I’ve seen this posted in several places as gospel, but where is any proof that supports this?

“If that Christian customer instead asks for a blank cake that they’ll decorate themselves, the baker must sell it to them or else they are violating the equal protections clause.”

This is an issue too though. The only person who can enforce the requirement that the Muslim Baker sell the cake is the government and the only way the government can force someone to work is through force. What you end up with is the government using threat of force to require someone to work. Which is slavery at its core. Anyone should have the right to refuse work if they don’t want to.

“If that Christian customer instead asks for a blank cake that they’ll decorate themselves, the baker must sell it to them or else they are violating the equal protections clause.”

This is an issue too though. The only person who can enforce the requirement that the Muslim Baker sell the cake is the government and the only way the government can force someone to work is through force. What you end up with is the government using threat of force to require someone to work. Which is slavery at its core. Anyone should have the right to refuse work if they don’t want to.

Personally I think you should be able to decline any service to anyone for any reason. Anything less than that is government compelled work.

I believe this is probably what will happen if this ever becomes a big issue. GDPR was never intended to be navigable for anything except giant proprietary blob tech companies.

I believe this is probably what will happen if this ever becomes a big issue. GDPR was never intended to be navigable for anything except giant proprietary blob tech companies.

I believe this is probably what will happen if this ever becomes a big issue. GDPR was never intended to be navigable for anything except giant proprietary blob tech companies.

This isn’t really malicious compliance. This is the very foundation of the point made by the Supreme Court. You should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Anything less than that is the government engaging in violence to force you to work.