That I can understand, however I want to piont out that this is an Nvidia problem entirely. Wayland works perfectly fine under 2/3 hardware vendors.

Luckily, they finally open-sourced their shit so going forward, this will probably change. But chances are only from the 2000 series on, so it might take an upgrade for many folks…

All I know is that there are VNC and RDP solutions for Plasma and VNC solutions for Wayland in general.

You can autostart anything on any distro by putting the command in a startup script.

I love how people are complaining about Wayland not being ready or being unstable (whatever that even means, because it’s a protocol), while it’s the default on both GNOME and Plasma now, which combined probably run on more than 50% of Linux desktops these days.

And not only that, but Cinnamon, Xfce and others want to follow, so very clearly people who know a fair bit about desktops seem to disagree with Wayland being “not ready”.

It does not and whatever distro you choose, it will not.

Ein Glück haben wir dafür das Dienstwagenprivileg behalten und Bahn und Brücken trotzdem nicht repariert 🟡🙄

And yet I never do and it hardly ever does. And if it does, it’s more often than not application specific and fixed by loading a snapshot and updating again after a week or so, which is next to 0 effort.

100% agree, anonymized data is pretty much irrelevant to the GDPR. An exception would be if it can be de-anonymized with reasonable means.

From anecdotal experience I can only tell you that not once have I witnessed a showstopper bug on Arch. I recommend using btrfs and snapshots to really make sure however.

I’m gonna go with no, because of containerization and permission management. On your computer, any program can do pretty much anything, unless you explicitly take measures against this. On a smartphone, you get a lot of control over your apps. In newer Android versions you can even completely disable cameras and microphones (even if only in software).

I would use a throwaway account and avoid giving Google any personal data tho. Of course they could still figure stuff out, but it’s harder and unreliable, not to mention super-duper illegal (at least in the EU), so I kinda doubt they go the extra mile.

Man munkelt das stößt gar nicht so wenigen in der CDU sauer auf - denn die regieren entweder schon mit den Grünen oder wissen, dass sie vielleicht keine Wahl haben, wenn die Kräfteverhältnisse nur schlecht (bzw. gut :P) genug stehen.

Sogar Imperator Merz höchst selbst passt inzwischen auf, wie er sich bzgl. Koalitionen äußert. Außer der Ampel natürlich. Die unterstützt Kriminelle, hat ganz alleine alle Brücken kaputt gemacht und VW gegen die Wand gefahren. Das weiß jeder.

To add to this, there aren’t that many forks (in the true sense of the word) of Arch for the same reason.

Dies. Hab einen Bekannten gefragt, ob ihm das Kantinen-Curry nicht viel zu mild ist, er meinte er mag es gar nicht so scharf und meine Welt zerbrach.

I will make my own Brazil, with hate speech and rockets 😢

Because they worry about any other weapon? Or the extremely rare case that someone actually has a highly dangerous fire arm? My point is that they can have much less drastic standard procedures (and equipment), because the standard scenario of operation is significantly less threatening.

There are special forces that get involved with the real shit. But the bar for real shit here is someone has any gun.

He probably wasn’t arrested. It sounds like the police handcuffed him while checking whether he was indeed alone and then asked about what he was doing at his computer. After he explained, they asked him to turn off the stream, at which point I would assume he was freed again.

I assume they went on to explain the situation and then questioned him. If there is no evidence of any crime, they will just take his personals so they can contact him on any development. He is the victim of a crime after all.

Isn’t it amazing how you can “SWAT” (from the looks of it that weren’t special forces btw.) someone by knocking on the door, instead of blasting through it and charging in, ready to shoot anything that moves?

That’s something you can do if you don’t have to be afraid of shotguns and full-auto rifles when going into random people’s houses.

Didn’t they perform 3 test flights this year alone? (Under Biden?)

Ich mag wie die Ziele ihrer Spinnereien sie inzwischen einfach komplett ignorieren. Aber was will man auch machen, wenn dein Gegenüber so sexistisch ist, dass sich alles auf “du bist männlich und anderer Meinung, ergo der Feind” reduziert.

There is hard evidence these checks prevent crime (i.e. smuggling and human trafficking), as well as evasion of judicial measures. So, since these checks will not just go away in the foreseeable future, he needs to provide a better alternative.

Edit: I don’t really get Denmark and Benelux tho. I doubt there is that much going on via these borders, but maybe I’m mistaken? I can see smuggling over their ports could be a problem, but that could be resolved by tightening security there instead of at the borders.

Casual reminder that Politico is owned by Spring SE, which makes it inherently unreliable since it’s held and led by (very) few ultra rich people.