berrytopylus [she/her,they/them]

  • 1 Post
  • 31 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2021

help-circle


  • Lol what the fuck is that petition, there is no way 4.5k people work at Casa Bonita who would be affected by it when they don’t even have 350 staff.

    That means at least some part of the signatures are not employees but outsiders trying to speak for the employees.

    Which also means that they might not even represent many employees to begin with! For all we know 99% of workers don’t want to go back to tipping.

    And going off the line at the bottom (although it is quite possible they are lying, management does lie often), it seems like that could potentially be the case. After all the article only identified two people who were upset.

    Of 256 employees, 93 were a part of the shift and only two said they were unhappy about it, management said at the time.

    The petition claims to have more than this but it also claims to have almost 5k signed on so it’s pretty unreasonable.



  • berrytopylus [she/her,they/them]@hexbear.nettothe_dunk_tank@hexbear.netMAO IS CANCELLED
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The idea that Mao had regressive views on women should not be shocking in the slightest. Modern women’s rights are really really recent developments across the world.

    One shocking fact I like to bring up is that women weren’t even allowed to own their bank accounts till like the 70s/80s. My mom brings that one up when talking about how much things have changed since her childhood.

    But it’s also not particularly relevant. People don’t listen to Mao for his views on women’s rights. It’s the same way we don’t dismiss electricity just because the society back then owned slaves.





  • A lot of this reporting is a big misunderstanding of statistics.

    As the study says

    About 45% of the population had zero beef consumption on any given day, whereas the 12% of disproportionate beef consumers accounted for 50% of the total beef consumed

    Now just as a thought experiment, do you think that almost half of the US never eats any beef? No, of course not. But on any given day? Sure, quite possible. People’s diets vary.

    A randomly selected person might have a McDonald’s hamburger for lunch and a steak for dinner and be part of the 12% on the first day but then eat mushroom ravioli for lunch and pizza for dinner on the second day and be part of the 45%.

    And there might be certain demographics that are more likely to make up that 12% on a given day but that doesn’t mean there’s a particular nonchanging group of high consumers.

    I’m not going to dig into the study here but just as an example, let’s say Dog Breed X is 1.5 times more likely to bark than Dog Breed Y is. You can’t hear a dog bark and say “Ah it must be Breed X then!”, you can only say “Ah, it’s more likely from Breed X than Breed Y”.



  • I think that way about evolution sometimes. It’s blitheringly obvious when you consider the two points

    1. There is a difference between parent and offspring and yet they also inherit traits
    2. Differences add up

    Both are easily observable in the natural world. The first one can be seen with babies “oh you have your mother’s eyes” while also the baby not literally being the mom. The second one is used by walking where we cross a large distance one step at a time.

    And all you need is those two principles to come to the conclusion that the small yet inheritable differences between offspring will add up over a long period of time. The question to be asked isn’t if it will happen but rather just what traits it happens to.

    And yet, it took humanity (and for many people still they refuse) millennial to grasp it. I’m looking at the process as so simple only from the lens of someone born after it was figured out.