yes and he fervently defends them if you dare criticize them

he’s banned in c/news unfortunately. someone should make a c/politics post about this dogshit convention i bet he’d show up to a thread about it in there

thanks!

by poking around you mean you’ve told them insider info or? and just out of curiosity, is there any particular reason as to why not?

would you consider writing a more through, more “academic” (for lack of a better word) on this for Unity-Struggle-Unity? seems like it would fit well with their current campaign against CPUSA, and I know they don’t mind publishing articles from anonymous online communists because they just published an article from @CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml in their newspaper

also very likely got away with

because he already purged all the rational ones years ago when he started banning anyone that showed the most mild of criticisms on his subreddit, he’s spiraling real bad if he really does think his carefully cultivated cult following has turned against him in any form.

your guess is as good as mine. just unprincipled liberal things really

Honestly, the typical source of friction causing interactions is the inability to accept that different people can interpret things differently

db0 can’t see this because (as the liberal they are) they defederated from grad awhile ago, but holy shit this kind of opinion really does help reinforce the obvious truth that they are a liberal.

how could you forget econ and business, both are ground zero for hitler particles in universities.

That really shook you to be confronted with the suspicion you’re the same guy, after you swiftly tracked down criticism of him on a popular post?

huh? not actually sure what you’re talking about, I was just scrolling back through the dunk dank and saw the post had blown up after i commented (which you evidently should have seen was posted an hour before yours based off time stamps).

He’s obviously read the guy, he’s made many posts calling him out. in fact, the very first post about hudson was him listening to an interview he made with ben norton, not attacking the guy for his autobiography.

making unsubstantiated claims about people is fucked up, no matter how big or small their account is. also weird behavior to dm me a secondary part of it

I generally disagree. I really dislike his position on how people use language (like he hyperfocuses on pretending you arent serious about a conversation if you use “lol” or “lmao”) but i find him to be one of the few people on twitter with a big following that will actually engage with anyone no matter how much or how little clout they have and mostly engage with your arguments as long as you steer clear of stuff he really dislikes like using lmao. Do you hate his articles too? I’ve generally agreed with the analysis he’s had in all of the ones I’ve read, I’d be open to any criticsms of them that you know of in that case.

accusing someone of pretending to be a trans woman on the internet is a big deal actually, and if you don’t have anything to show im just gonna assume you made it up and deserve to be banned for it.

??? i have never seen anyone imply either those twitter accounts are sockpuppets, and i’d like to see actual evidence for a big claim like that.

i dont understand why he doesnt just subscribe to the more serious communities like c/theory and what not and ignore the rest of the site, i guess it would be lower engagement but like he had to deal with twitter morons all the time i dont see why he just doesnt do that. or make a lemmygrad account and make a community that solely revolves around serious discussions and what not

great thing to log in to and have on my front page! Wish we could have this so bad man lol

yeah like the draft was used in Amerikkka until the end of their involvement in the Vietnam war and only stopped using it because it was causing too much radicalization among their troops, wtf is this person talking about “warfare in the civilized world”

maybe. my pushback is that capitalist countries have either largely not used planning or abandoned it due to pressure from daddy USA, so i really dont think we can use them to predict China’s growth

I’ve seen liberals on reddit and other sites mention this kind of thing before. i’d like some sort of real explanation that high gdp growth will be a predictor for lower gdp growth in the future. If not, i dont think there’s any real reason to worry about China’s gdp growth to dramatically lower in the coming years