I also agree we don’t need this movie remade. However, I don’t think it’s fair to say there are no ideas in the movie for contemporary audiences. There’s a lot of subtext if you look past the religious layer! It really is a masterclass in horror

Thank you for clarifying. I misinterpreted the question, my apologies. Two movies that immediately come to mind:

Vampyr (1932) has a great double exposure sequence which no doubt would have been much easier to shoot with modern methods. Strongly recommended to fans of early horror movies. It features several shots that are both haunting and absolute classics.

Staying with the same director, Dreyer, The Passion of Joan of Arc would be another candidate. The camera angles in themselves are an effect and contribute to the oppressively disconcerting atmosphere. The way the set was designed with holes in the walls to allow for the camera to be placed in certain ways is genius. Modern methods would not have improved on this aspect of the film, but, on the other hand, nevermind CGI or effects, this movie features a bloodletting scene which could not happen today!

What a strange question. “What older movies made a good use of side stepping special effects?” Do you mean any of the stories which do not need such effects in the first place?

Also, special effects “holding up today” is in no way necessary for a good picture… There are many great films with dated effects.

I agree with the other posters, nothing to roast!

Everything looks good to me, but I’d experiment with putting the fuzz sooner in the chain, either right before or right after the wah, personally. I’m not too familiar with the superfuzz circuit, but some fuzzes I would put before a compressor, also.

If you’ve never played guitar loud enough to get feedback from your amp, you’re missing out!

Looks delicious! Now I feel like I could really go for a barleywine… Thanks for sharing!

Only 150 games? I’m pretty sure you could find many people with more experience than that at any FLGS.

C’est une très belle initiative, merci!

I fail to see what any of this has to do with an economic system. These are scientific or legal topics.

And indeed, slavery is present under unchecked capitalism as well.

Very nice! Enjoy!

How are you finding the low friction pot? I heard it was easy to knock it out of position while playing, are you finding that to be an issue?

Merci du partage! C’est très bien résumé!

Forgive me for asking, but I’m not sure how this could be framed as subsidizing private practices?

In my mind, despite flaws with the program, relieving the cost of treatment for patients is worth it.

You are covered “100%” of a fee they pulled out of thin air. They’ve essentially invented a fee guide without any input from the different provincial dental associations. These invented fees are of course lower than standard fees. How would it ever make sense that a procedure would cost exactly the same across the country, from the fanciest office downtown somewhere, to a minimalist office in someone’s house in a rural area? They chose to cover less than what the latter would charge.

It sucks that Sun Life is deceitful in presenting the plan and it’s easy for them to paint dentists in a negative light. I’m sorry you’re getting played like this, much like everyone else is!

Opti-Rinse is some good stuff, I second the recommendation.

Not an expert on the topic, but two factors come to mind:

-The cost of a medical degree in Canada is relatively cheap, so med students not intending to practice there are incentivized to study there and leave the country shortly after graduating. This is a double whammy because for every doctor who leaves, a doctor who would have stayed could have been trained in their stead.

-Doctors can easily move across the southern border to earn much more than they would in Canada.

Loafing the pictures. Looks delicious! Keep them coming, and thanks for sharing!

Très intéressant! Merci du partage!