I don’t believe so. But you’ll see them pop up in trading and buy/sell groups on fb, there’s always a handful of people who have to change their plans for one reason or another and need to get rid of them, sometimes at cost. I’d even pay attention to fb groups based in toronto and nearby cities, I’ve been seeing passes popping up in them all week.

The value of TSLA is more relevant to his debt financing than whether Twitter is operating or not.

They didn’t put new money into the purchase, they rolled their pre-existing shares over. Dorsey did the same FYI.

Y’all are giving this idiot waaaay too much credit when it comes to scheming behind the scenes. It was a really poorly thought out pump and dump, nothing more. There’s no big evil master plan; he’s just really that stupid, and rich enough to constantly fail upwards. With Xitter we’re just seeing his xitty ideas in their purest form, without the influence of the handlers he has to manage his bullxit at his other companies.

Although I have to say, the accidental brilliance of going with branding that’s so phonologically flexible is pretty fantastic, the jokes can write themselves now. But I doubt advertisers are going to appreciate the fact that their interactions on Xitter are colloquially becoming known as xcrements now…

I think it’s more along the lines of the “it’s a bold strategy, Cotton, let’s see if it pays off for 'em” sentiment

I mean… take your pick on who he hasn’t paid, there are pleeeeenty of examples out there. He even lost the ability to engage in arbitration over the unpaid severance because he didn’t pay the mediators lmfao. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=twitter+unpaid+bills

Serious question for you- why are you defending him? Like, the information demonstrating he’s kind of stupid and a terrible person is so easily available to you. At this point you have to actively work to remain ignorant of it, and his history of trying to claim accomplishments that aren’t his own. Why bother?

oh boy, “daring use of green screen throughout the film”, this is going to be the Breeniest of Neil Breen films and I am so down for it! thank you for sharing OP! :)

The Lufa model needs to spread across the country. They have a handful of urban greenhouses in Montreal, so a lot of the produce I buy is actually grown in the city, and everything else that they can’t grow themselves is procured directly from the producers/farms, not from a re-seller.

(although, fuck their labour practices, I very much wish they had competition in the city so they would be pressured to clean up their act in that regard, I hate that I feel like I have to compromise my values in some way in order to buy local and direct)

I

N

T

E

G

R

A

T

I

O

N

but no, no greedflation here

aha, this comment makes your position a bit more clear for me. reading your initial response had me feeling a bit kerfuffled because, for me and for the progressive people I know, the line is pretty clear as to what’s acceptable and what’s not- it comes down to whether someone is making an attempt to dehumanize others or defend those actions in others. there’s SO much effort being made to paint the position of “the left” as anything and everything else, but it really does boil down to standing for the humanity and dignity of others. when our poorest, weakest, most vulnerable members of society can thrive, we all thrive. it’s important to recognize beliefs that are trying to masquerade as that when they’re really something else altogether.

in other words, I think it’s important to really get at what a belief is about. I wouldn’t call that automatic pushback against men’s rights and supporting men progressive or left wing, tbh. you’re so right that there is a ton of automatic pushback on the part of a lot of people because they assume men’s rights = the typical MRA misogyny. misandry is woven into so much of that response and people don’t necessarily consider how they’re hurting others in an extremely similar way when they embrace that narrative. the conversation around how to support men does get so toxic so quickly for a few reasons, yet it’s not the zero-sum game many people treat it as. the reality is, men can be subject to things like domestic violence and rape too, and they deserve support just like anyone else in those situations. at a fundamental level, supporting men in these situations isn’t the threat to women and others that a ton of people treat it as in their knee-jerk reaction to the topic. these hard topics deserve discussion and consideration too, but often the reactions we’re talking about, that pushback, doesn’t come from a place of offering respect and dignity. and that’s not very “left wing”, so to speak.

I think because I’m queer, pan specifically, there’s a sort of odd sort of advantage in this regard in being exposed to situations where calling out regressive beliefs that masquerade as progressive happens a bit more frequently. there are pleeeenty of examples of this in queer spaces- misogyny from gay men, misandry from gay and bi women (honestly, in my experience the latter has been MORE problematic in that regard, but I’m keenly aware that’s my own experience and maybe not that of others), TERF & LBG-but-not-the-T groups, and bi erasure are all queer examples of this that are encountered, sadly, not infrequently. Pride is meant to be a radical celebration of people living their life to the fullest as their true self, and it’s so often not, instead bogged down by division, othering, and sometimes downright hatred. There are unfortunately a lot of people out there who treat their own queerness as a zero-sum game where breaking the mould and being different is seen as a threat to their own existence because that’s just how their belief system works. People don’t necessarily want to think of themselves as regressive in their beliefs, but when they’re pushing a narrative of misinformation or hate, it’s so, so important to recognize and call out that bullshit for exactly what it is- it’s not left-wing, it’s not progressive, it’s a defense of a status quo that harms others.

Outside of queer spaces, you might not get as much exposure to digging at problematic viewpoints like that, to the pushback that happens to that reaction you’re talking about. It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking “both sides” when you have these anecdotes of harm, but when you really dig into the beliefs, it’s really not both sides, at all. It’s important to call out regressive beliefs for what they are, it’s important to identify a hateful belief as such, and it takes so much courage to do that when those voices are screaming at you and over you from different directions. I hope you know, this queer gal sees you and what you’re advocating for when it comes to supporting men who face harm, and supports you in that.

Red pill/blue pill was written as an analogy to the experience of trans people, as well. The ignorance with how they’ve co-opted the concept runs quite deep.

He literally fired the team in charge of that 😆

omg I COMPLETELY missed the user name and didn’t recognize who it was 🤣🤣🤣 thank you bahaha. I like you, Lemmy friend

Oh just stop with this nonsense. Your statement about “convoluting factors” demonstrates your complete and total ignorance of the strength and weight and sheer amount of evidence behind mRNA technology available at this point. Antivaxx talking points rely on these fundamental misunderstandings and ignorance, lmfao at your attempt to condescend to lay people in this way when you clearly don’t even know how RCTs are run or fundamentally work. There are actually decades of research behind this stuff at this point, this misinformation is tired and old. And so easily disproven by listening to people who understand the science, who work with the science, who have engaged with the evidence. And to pre-emptively rebuttal against the appeal to authority you might be chomping at the bit to make- being a pioneer a few decades ago in the field means nothing if you haven’t kept abreast to new discoveries, innovations, and evidence. I can just see you being “part of the community” as a lab manager or something, a pencil pusher at best, nothing more and certainly not someone with the training to understand the statements you’re making.

The fun part of this whole issue is that since SCOTUS has recently established people can bring forward made-up cases based on “what ifs” for violating fundamental rights and causing harm, someone in the US could plausibly sue people like you for the potential harm you may cause, because we’re talking not just about a mountain of biological and medical research, but an overwhelming amount of epidemiological data as well. Literal population-level bodies of evidence concerning how much harms views like yours have caused. Fun, eh?

Medical doctors who didn’t follow the evidence deserved to be spoken over and shut down by their peers. If you fail in your fundamental understanding of what your job is, the basic science behind medicine, you shouldn’t be practicing anymore.

And if we’re talking about comparisons to things like lobotomy, again, and I’ll say it slow for you so you can follow closely- The. Strength. Of. The. Evidence. Matters. When the evidence that lobotomy is incredibly harmful and not treating the issues it was purported to treat in any way became overwhelming, guess what? The standards changed. When the evidence is overwhelming yet you still cling to conspiracies, you deserve to be shut down, no one owes you a platform for your deceit and lies and misinformation.

I’m curious about this as well, because the lurkers in the montreal sub sure are quick to come out of the woodwork whenever the protest is mentioned. I can’t see how it’s not bots, but I’m curious about how that would work exactly and how you determine that

lpt- reuters only uses a soft paywall, you can bypass it pretty easily by opening articles in an incognito/private window