California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a new law on Wednesday that aims to stop other states from prosecuting doctors and pharmacists who mail abortion pills to patients in places where the procedure is banned.

California already has a law protecting doctors who provide abortions from out-of-state judgements. But that law was designed to protect doctors who treat patients from other states who travel to California.

The new law goes further by forbidding authorities from cooperating with out-of-state investigations into doctors who mail abortion pills to patients in other states. It also bans bounty hunters or bail agents from apprehending doctors, pharmacists and patients in California and transporting them to another state to stand trial for providing an abortion.

Other states, including New York and Massachusetts, have similar laws. But California’s law also bars state-based social media companies — like Facebook — from complying with out-of-state subpoenas, warrants or other requests for records to discover the identity of patients seeking abortion pills.

      • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        209 months ago

        “Friend” or family member tipping off police and/or subpoenas for electronic messages are two ways that spring to mind, but those can be prevented if people are vigilant

          • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            89 months ago

            Exactly, and if you have a fundamentalist Christian friend who seems like a nice person (if you volunteer in animal shelters or food banks or the like you run into a lot of these), know that they will get you arrested without a moment’s doubt and just pray extra hard for you while you’re sitting in a jail cell

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          169 months ago

          True. If people aren’t careful, they could get caught. But you could say that about weed in Texas too.

          • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            89 months ago

            Exactly, it’s a complete disgrace that people will have to be mindful of this crap just to get the reproductive healthcare they need, but if the government can’t stop a people from transporting big old stinky plants on a regular basis good luck stopping people from delivering a few pills on the occasions when they’re needed

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          I guess theoretically they could do that, but I doubt deep-cut Republican Texas could afford it.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            169 months ago

            Amazingly, there’s always no funds for relief, plenty for oppression.

          • @pau_hana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            True, and I am not a lawyer, but I think a judge would be able to issue a warrant if there was reasonable suspicion of a “crime” being committed in that local jurisdiction. Or would something I am overlooking prevent such a warrant? It seems like the woman could be legally vulnerable in such a case.

            • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              I’m not a lawyer either, but I think you’re absolutely right about potential legal vulnerability, but that probable cause isn’t going to be an easy thing for the prosecution to get. Like, miscarriages just happen all the time, and (theoretically) the strength of probable cause a judge would want to ok a “we’re taking some of your bodily fluids” warrant is going to be about as high as it gets.