• Russia plans to increase its troops along its border with NATO, Lithuania’s prime minister said.
  • Ingrida Šimonytė said Russia is returning to a Cold War posture and Europe needs to be prepared.
  • Estonia also warned that Russia may double its troops along NATO’s border compared to 2022 figures
  • @khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Here’s my prediction for historical purposes:

    • In the next 10 years the three Baltic nations will be invaded
    • it’s done via North West Russia, Belarus and Kaliningrad simultaneously
    • This leaves only the tiny border with Poland to defend for those states if it’s successful because subs are gonna sub any coastal attempt at a D-Day
    • Tactical, low yield nukes will be used to deter future responses because NATO has shown a strategic weakness on their desire to avoid escalation
    • It’s coordinated with an invasion of Taiwan to spread the West thin

    That’s it. That’s my prediction based on having lived through the cold war and being interested in history.

    I really fucking hope I’m wrong.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 months ago

      Here’s where you’re wrong: Finland. It provides easy striking distance for St Petersburg and Murmansk (which is an important naval base). Hit St Petersburg, and the Baltic states are at far less risk of being cut off.

      Strike Sevestapol, and Russia is cut off from the Atlantic.

      Balarus isn’t guaranteed to stay a Russian ally, either. That’s Lukashenko’s thing, but his grip on power could still slip away.

      • @khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I hear you but Russia has made it clear that any existential threat will result in nuclear war so that rules out going onto their internationally recognised land without risking that.

        Taking back invaded land is a different matter as we’ve seen.

        Edit: And I’ve limited understanding on this but I thought Belarus had already agreed to become part of the Russian federation. I hold out hope they’ll move back to democracy and agree that would definitely change things strategically.

        • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          Russia has made it clear that any existential threat will result in nuclear war

          putin said that, kill him and his generals aren’t going to stay behind to a dead guy

        • @nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          A fucking wrong sneeze on Russian soil is enough for a nuclear threat. If he’s going to do it, we can’t do shit about it anyway, because he’s going to use all excuses left in the book. He’s going to spin some narrative and either Russians will actually grow a spine and refuse the order - or won’t.

          The only thing we can hope is, that they didn’t change the plutonium in the warheads so they are all duds.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      I agree that’s probably the plan.

      The problem with that plan is that nuclear NATO countries have a very clear policy of launching in case of a NATO country being invaded. And nobody expects a nuke not to be met with more nukes.

      Russian subs are shit. And won’t be able to stop Western naval power.

      Every warm water Russian port is well within bombing range.

      The US is setup to fight a two front war. And it’s not even on a war production footing.

      We’re under no obligation to strike back in the Baltics. We could easily snap an alliance with Ukraine, and unleash the F-35 and B-21 on that very large front. Russian supplies, and command, will cease to exist over night. And their front lines shortly thereafter. Their Air Force couldn’t get superiority against Ukraine. They aren’t going to last five minutes against the US Air Force and Navy. (The Marine planes will be busy teaching the Chinese the same lesson)

    • @bradorsomething
      link
      English
      63 months ago

      That’s a pretty reasonable prediction; I’d add that the optimal time would be year 3 of a trump presidency.

    • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      you are puting to much faith in their organizational capability, also logistics, the same argument was made for the 3 days military operation, also putin is going to be dead by them

    • @soEZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      I am woundering when russia decides to use tactical nukes in Ukraine. - the way they are gonnna spin the last terrorist attack( assuming its not an inside job…prob is.) sure does not give me warm fuzzy feelings about their desparation…

      • @khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        I feel like it’s an inevitability, personally. They’ll call it territorial defense, given their claims on Donetsk and Luhansk and / or in the opening shots of a NATO war to show they mean business.

        • @bradorsomething
          link
          English
          43 months ago

          I feel they missed the window for this after the Kharkiv withdrawal. At this point the US has made it clear they would respond with conventional strikes on military targets.