• Gloomy@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    The right is losing it because Harris said she worked at a McD bad has shown no prove of it.

    Possible she never has and it’s a lie to appeal to the working class voters. Or not. I honestly dgaf.

    This right is behaving as if Trump never told a single lie in his long life. It’s Harris making a claim without backing it up has been THE THING all week now on most right wing forums I peek at.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s worse than this. They’re saying because it wasn’t on her resume (curriculum vitae) 20 years later when she was going for another job, possibly a law job, that it means she was lying.

      These dumb fucks don’t realise that CVs are for listing relevant work to the role you’re applying for. When I was applying to become a software developer I too didn’t list McD on my CV because that’s fucking dumb.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        Exactly this. When I created my very first CV - at the guidance of people from uni - I listed NO experience rather than listing irrelevant jobs when going for my first work study type of jobs. The people that believe this about Harris are just showing how little they know of the professional world.

      • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Trump is exceptionally unequipped for this because the presidency is the only job Trump ever “applied” for in his life and when we fired him he organized a violent coup, including a gallows for Vice President Michael Pencil. He might really believe resumes contain all of someone’s job history, or he may be throwing ketchup at the wall again.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Weirdly enough, at 47, I no longer list the dish washing job I had at Ponderosa Steakhouse when I was 16 on my resume.

        And I’m not even an attorney.

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Not 20 years later, but at all. At least that I’d their claim and I haven’t seen it debunked do far.

        I’ll reluctantly link a right wing article that at least tries to come across not overly sensational:

        The Free Beacon also obtained a copy of Harris’s October 1987 job application for a law clerk position in the Alameda County district attorney’s office. On that form, Harris, who was in law school at the time, listed several jobs—including a month-long clerical job at a stock brokerage—in a section that asked her to list every position she held in the last 10 years. McDonald’s is absent.

        Harris lists three jobs on the application and five in total on an attached résumé, according to the documents, obtained through a public records request. Harris, who submitted the application as a second-year student at then-University of California, Hastings College of the Law, included granular life experience on her résumé—“extensive travel in India, Africa, [and] Europe” and “lived in Montreal, Canada for six years”—but not McDonald’s.

        They’ve got photos of the resume and all.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          The three jobs listed on there are somewhat relevant to the law clerk role she was applying for, so I can see why McD wouldn’t be on there.

          Surely, Harris should just release her tax information from that time that show she was paid by McD.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Possible she never has and it’s a lie to appeal to the working class voters. Or not. I honestly dgaf.

      The weird thing is that they’ll tolerate literally any lie from donnie and still vote for him.

      Or, maybe not that weird. He’s a rich (allegedly), white, male, nominally xtian, Republican, bidnessman. No need to apply any kind of standards.