Just seems funny how we have so much “choice”…except for where it actually matters

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    hope you don’t mind me pasting in the reference

    Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.

    Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?

    Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.

    from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like to phrase it this way. In America the market is a wild animal. A coyote that is opportunistic and feral. In China is is domesticated. A dog that is kept leashed. And should it become feral it will be put down.