Sludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · vor 1 JahrUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzexternal-linkmessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1447arrow-down15cross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
arrow-up1442arrow-down1external-linkUS attorney for DC accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda’, threatens non-profit statuswww.nzherald.co.nzSludgehammer@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · vor 1 Jahrmessage-square52linkfedilinkcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down27·vor 1 JahrRemoved by mod
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·vor 1 JahrI went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out. What am I missing?
minus-squareTronBronson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·vor 1 JahrNothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
minus-squarebluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·vor 1 JahrThe truth pretty much always is
minus-squareBloomcole@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·vor 1 JahrRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
I went there; my first take is that it’s full of wanna be editors who were rejected or edited out.
What am I missing?
Nothing people hate on Wikipedia for all kinds of reasons. Mostly because they don’t believe in checking sources. And when information is cited it becomes woke.
The truth pretty much always is
Removed by mod