ZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMax users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1210arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: moviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1206arrow-down1external-linkMax users grandfathered into $15.99 ad-free plan lose 4K, HDR next montharstechnica.comZeroCool@feddit.ch to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: moviesandtv@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareWrench@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoStoring is done once by simply offering a 4k option*. Bandwidth is an ongoing cost per view, but no where near the increased plan cost to cover it. *technically more than once because of distributed CDNs which would need to scale to demand. But negligible.
minus-squareSocsa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI mean they cache it all via CDN. In some cases that means they’ve got 1000 copies of a popular show sitting on CDNs around the world, and in some cases that means they are dynamically pushing content to CDNs on demand.
Storing is done once by simply offering a 4k option*.
Bandwidth is an ongoing cost per view, but no where near the increased plan cost to cover it.
*technically more than once because of distributed CDNs which would need to scale to demand. But negligible.
I mean they cache it all via CDN. In some cases that means they’ve got 1000 copies of a popular show sitting on CDNs around the world, and in some cases that means they are dynamically pushing content to CDNs on demand.