His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • Iapar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I’m glad we have the right to say no to that. That’s the whole point of this ruling.

        If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn’t have been allowed to say no.

      • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It’s perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who’s not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots.

        You get how this works now?