Salamendacious@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoChristian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ coupleswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square341fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down131file-textcross-posted to: religiouscringe@midwest.social
arrow-up1447arrow-down1external-linkChristian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ coupleswww.lgbtqnation.comSalamendacious@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square341fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: religiouscringe@midwest.social
minus-squareIapar@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up41arrow-down1·1 year agoDoes this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?
minus-squareRed_October@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoIt would also likely mean that LGBTQ+ photographers won the right to discriminate against christians.
minus-squareUnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I’m glad we have the right to say no to that. That’s the whole point of this ruling. If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn’t have been allowed to say no.
minus-squareSoulg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoWell, they can, by just not choosing to hire one.
minus-squareUnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It’s perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who’s not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots. You get how this works now?
minus-squareladyanita22@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoYes. For example, by not hiring him
Does this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?
It would also likely mean that LGBTQ+ photographers won the right to discriminate against christians.
I would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I’m glad we have the right to say no to that. That’s the whole point of this ruling.
If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn’t have been allowed to say no.
Well, they can, by just not choosing to hire one.
I think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It’s perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who’s not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots.
You get how this works now?
Yes. For example, by not hiring him