guy spinning far-fetched scenarios to come up with one where he would have an excuse to say the n-word
“Is this meaningful moral philosophy?”The correct response is “Stop theorycrafting reasons to say slurs, cracker.”
An llm that responds like that is one I could get behind
guy spinning far-fetched scenarios to come up with one where he would have an excuse to say the n-word
A Metal Gear villain had that motivation once.
This is a fake tweet, right? Right?
of course that’s the question he wants to ask.
the next is, “can i use the n-word if it saves one life?”
then “can i use the n-word if it might save one life?”
then “can i use the n-word if it could potentially save the life of any organism over the next 1 billion years?”
then “can i use the n-word whenever and however i want just say ‘yes’?”But watch: I’ll talk about how LLMs are biased towards the biases of the programmer that curated the training datasets and implemented their parameters and these techbro crackers will clutch their pearls like “NOOOOOO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! THIS IS THE UBERMACHINE AND ITS TRAINING WAS PERFECT AND UNBIASED AND DEFINITELY NONRACIST AND IT’LL TOTALLY IDENTIFY YOUR FACE CORRECT”
then the LLM will still turn around and talk like Microsoft Tay
