• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    There’s no downside for consumers, sucks if you are making art for an oversaturated market.

    But that’s why artists should get a UBI

    • PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      No not UBI, but universal necessities to live. ie food water electricity housing healthcare and for all people not just artists.

      UBI is a bandaid solution where money is taken from the government and given to corporations when governments should supply those necessities itself.

      • Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think it’s more efficient if people get a few hundred dollar boost every week to spend when and wherever they please, rather then stand in line and receive whatever obtuse handout the government has decided they deserve.

        • PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          For Literally everything but food the government can supply everything without standing in line. You are right though, I believe SNAP in America is a largely efficient organisation that takes an already convenient system of food distribution and allows the person to buy things at a grocery store like everybody else. I guess in society it’s also important that SNAP or other beneficiaries feel normal as well.