• jjjalljs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My dad said something like this a couple months back. He didn’t think workers could run a business. When I pointed out all the bad decisions I’ve seen my bosses make, especially the ones made over the injections objections of workers, he didn’t have much of a response.

    People believe things emotionally. (All of us are susceptible to this, sadly.)

    Edit: fix strange autocorrect of injections instead of objections

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      especially the ones made over the injections of workers

      Well there’s the problem! As good as it sounds, you actually lose a lot of the nutrition when employees are processed into injectable paste. Ultra processed workers are bad for you.

      Eat them raw as capitalism intended!

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The problem with groups isn’t that they make bad decisions, it’s that they struggle to make any kind of decision.

      Doesn’t matter if it’s a boss, an owner, or a rep, someone has to take responsibility or nothing ever happens.

      Ever watched six people try and Schedule a D&D session? 🤣

      • jjjalljs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Usually some people will take initiative and some people will delegate their responsibilities. Form committees , that sort of thing.

          • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Efficiency doesn’t need to be the highest prioritized metric in a business. It’s pretty important, but there are more important things

          • jjjalljs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Even in the capitalist hellscape of tech startups, we have like a frontend group that makes decisions about the front end code that’s separate from the entire engineering org. Likewise there’s one for the backend, for devops concerns, and so on.

            Some orgs are disorganized and require a lot of vertical approval steps, but that’s not an inherent nature of committee

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You have a head of UX that makes the decisions (at least in the dozens of startups I have worked in/with).

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            For hierarchical committees where order needs to come from the top down, sure, your sarcasm is warranted.

            Still, there are other structures of committee organization that are horizontal in nature and allow for much more flexibility when it comes to needing to make decisions.

          • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Interacting with people who haven’t lived their entire lives as boot lickers. Or failing to see all the times people to manage. Ttrpg groups for example do occasionally occur. They have been played before.

            First steps not being unsteady is weird. Everybody’s gonna fuck up the first few times. There exist tools to help, though I’m more a solitary creature and do not have any bookmarked.