This isn’t going to manufacture anything with europeans because the euro countries are all doing or in the stages of planning to do this centralisation. They are being convinced to do it by Palantir under the basis that a centralisation of data is better for AI parsing it.
The last slide just looks like a joke, nobody believes that Chinese social credit shit anymore serious except the most moronic of right wingers. Most libs have learned it’s not really true.
data centralization is hardly a palantir thing, not to sound like im defending their intentions with people’s data, but bureaucrats want consolidation and simplification independent of state surveillance.
having multiple divided certificates and identifications is neither security for individuals or a guard for civil rights generally–they have to put more words in the ‘state enemies don’t get X’ clause, big deal. the only reason the width of independent state documentation exists is because it was impossible to consolidate with the technology that existed when the systems were set up.
This isn’t going to manufacture anything with europeans because the euro countries are all doing or in the stages of planning to do this centralisation. They are being convinced to do it by Palantir under the basis that a centralisation of data is better for AI parsing it.
I think you underestimate the liberal ability to be hypocritical about their own beliefs.
It’ll be a “Yeah, it’s bad when it happens anywhere, which is why Venezuela’s government has to go!”
Oh, no, best part: somebody in the comments saying it was palantir doing it and that it was what they wanted to bring home to us.
The last slide just looks like a joke, nobody believes that Chinese social credit shit anymore serious except the most moronic of right wingers. Most libs have learned it’s not really true.
Nope, pretty sure libs definitely still believe it’s true.
You’d think so, but…
The feds are so drunk on their own sauce they don’t even realise how out of date their own propaganda is
data centralization is hardly a palantir thing, not to sound like im defending their intentions with people’s data, but bureaucrats want consolidation and simplification independent of state surveillance.
having multiple divided certificates and identifications is neither security for individuals or a guard for civil rights generally–they have to put more words in the ‘state enemies don’t get X’ clause, big deal. the only reason the width of independent state documentation exists is because it was impossible to consolidate with the technology that existed when the systems were set up.