I won’t argue about the value of explanation from a lying hallucinating machine.
But I like how your use case is “it does the things that I believe to be useless and time wasting for everyone involved. But instead of, pushing for the end of these time wasting acts, I waste a little less time with llms (instead of all of the time by not doing these time wasting acts) while still wasting the time of the reader.” What an efficient use case! We should violate IP law, waste drinking water and energy for it!
“IP law”? IP is not a good term. it suggests that ideas are property??
you see companies mining everything possible, such that dirt just goes <poof>! and your first thought is “oh no, the landowners had the right to those minerals! they should’ve bought a permit first!”(?)
How the hell is IP law connected to mining? But honestly yes, landowners should own the mining rights for their land and/or should have the right to buy them before it is sold to anyone else. It is not difficult to see why you don’t want someone dig under your land.
The problem is many people liked how it was, it makes more work to do, makes it seem official. I believe in that book bullshit jobs, and think most people are winging it with performative bullshit.
What I saw recently at my work is people received something that looked like AI slop from the head boss and they laughed about it, which got back to the boss, who then defended himself that it wasn’t AI.
So I’m hopeful that people are called out for wasting peoples time, and that long winded blobs of meaningless text become a firable offense.
I won’t argue about the value of explanation from a
lyinghallucinating machine.But I like how your use case is “it does the things that I believe to be useless and time wasting for everyone involved. But instead of, pushing for the end of these time wasting acts, I waste a little less time with llms (instead of all of the time by not doing these time wasting acts) while still wasting the time of the reader.” What an efficient use case! We should violate IP law, waste drinking water and energy for it!
“IP law”? IP is not a good term. it suggests that ideas are property??
you see companies mining everything possible, such that dirt just goes <poof>! and your first thought is “oh no, the landowners had the right to those minerals! they should’ve bought a permit first!”(?)
IP law is not a good term? “Intellectual property (IP) law” is not a good term? We should tell everyone, even wikipedia is using it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
How the hell is IP law connected to mining? But honestly yes, landowners should own the mining rights for their land and/or should have the right to buy them before it is sold to anyone else. It is not difficult to see why you don’t want someone dig under your land.
The problem is many people liked how it was, it makes more work to do, makes it seem official. I believe in that book bullshit jobs, and think most people are winging it with performative bullshit.
What I saw recently at my work is people received something that looked like AI slop from the head boss and they laughed about it, which got back to the boss, who then defended himself that it wasn’t AI.
So I’m hopeful that people are called out for wasting peoples time, and that long winded blobs of meaningless text become a firable offense.