fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agoAmericans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1944arrow-down110 cross-posted to: slop@hexbear.netnews@lemmings.worldDeFlock@sh.itjust.workshackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1934arrow-down1external-linkAmericans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square104linkfedilink cross-posted to: slop@hexbear.netnews@lemmings.worldDeFlock@sh.itjust.workshackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·11 days agoLasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I’ve heard.
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 days agoI think you’d need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn’t be enough, or so I’ve heard.
minus-squarebetterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 days agoSo what you’re saying is that I have an finally have an excuse a good reason to get a high-powered laser.
Lasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I’ve heard.
I think you’d need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn’t be enough, or so I’ve heard.
So what you’re saying is that I have an finally have
an excusea good reason to get a high-powered laser.Via con huevos, my friend!