• Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know. While I do think it’s a little funny to have the people who openly admit to “cheating” lose, we’re sort of forgetting that there are different ways to have an edge here. Like if you’re a world record holding olympic athlete you’re not competing on the same terms as an amateur college athlete, your training regiments can’t be the same, and the resources available to you are not the same.

    • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, there is a realistic discussion about “who actually has the resources to compete” but this event ain’t that. These drugs aren’t cheap and just doing them isn’t enough, you still need access to equipment or places to practice or coaches or whatever.

      • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay but one of the people he beat is literally a college athlete. Sure some of the retirees and semi pros have a good chance of training with good facilities, but there’s a reason they’re semi pros or retired.

        I’m not even asking you to have sympathy with anyone here, but “Record holding olympic athlete beats retiree and college athlete” isn’t really a headline is the thing.

        • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, but that’s not the headline. The headline is “record holding Olympic athlete doesn’t do drugs, wins a competition run by someone who thinks doing drugs means you can beat a record holding Olympic athlete”