Job postings be like
Well, that’s A solution to that particular paradox. If those are someone’s beliefs, well they’d be a hypocrite if they didn’t have sex with their bros. Or, I guess wives being “impure” after marriage would technically also work. Somehow I doubt they would like that one either. Oh right! Can’t forget that the Ben Franklin strategy also solves this paradox.
I’m still just going to stick with my prefered solution of not judging people based on arbitrary sexual standards. Bam, no paradox! It’s a strategy I recommend for everyone.
Entirely unrelated, but I wish English hadn’t abandoned that style of capitalization for emphasis. When you read Franklin’s letter, you can genuinely get a feel for his style of speech through his use of capitalization. Italics and bold just don’t carry the same message for me.
It’s not for emphasis. Nouns were commonly capitalized in English like they still are in German.
While they were much more likely to capitalize nouns, and it did have German influence, it was never all nouns as in German, and it was absolutely used for emphasis during that period of time. If you read through letters by Franklin, or Thomas Jefferson, or many of the prolific writers of the Day, you’ll see there are many nouns left uncapitalized, while seemingly important nouns (liberty, right, et cetera) are capitalized.
Here’s a stack exchange comment thread that talks about it
I’d find you a better source but I’m on a road trip right now.
Capitalization in English is a super fascinating rabbit hole to fall down. Grammar in general, really. It was a lot more free form before the mid 1800s, and that allowed an author’s voice to be a lot more personalized than in the modern day. Today, an author’s voice is mainly due to their vocabulary choices, and to a lesser extent their punctuation, but during that time author’s could choose different spellings, capitalizations, and other small idiosyncrasies that really let you get a feel for what their speech was like.
Obv theyre supposed to fuck married women.
Cucking for jesus
It is a great shame that the bottom assertion is not as common as the top assertion.
A truly righteous man would let his homeboys rail him. Take the team for the team.
Guys have been known to say to their women friends “if I was a girl I would let all the homies hit”… bro, don’t let your dreams stay dreams
Join the conversation
engage with the content
Join the fight.
makes me think of rome: where being the penetrator in male gay sex was virtous, chad, based, etc… being the penetrated was humiliating, and opinions on sex with a woman seems to have ranged from “why the fuck would you defile your penis, it belong only inside men!” to “fuck y’all gay mfers, i’m going to sex up my lovely wife every day and you can’t stop me!”
