The DesktopEditors github repo appears to have actual releases now, with multiple download options for various Linux distros, plus Windows and MacOS. While some refinement may still be needed, this represents a usable release without requiring manual building.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I do not understand why they used OnlyOffice as a starting point rather than LibreOffice. I’m guessing because it can be embedded in web shit? I can see why NextCloud pushed for it.

        • ahornsirup@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s the format that’s actually being used. If you want to make a difference you have to meet people where they are, not where you want them to be.

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            The format that’s being used is the proprietary one whatever MS is calling their office nowadays shits out not the actual ooxml standard. This is just going to reinforce MS propaganda that alternatives are inferior when the office suit fails to properly open files on it’s own preferred format.

          • anothermember@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sure but ODF support doesn’t conflict with that, by all means they should attempt MS compatibility while it’s still so dominant, but not supporting ODF is a choice that will only ensure things will never change.

          • Denys Nykula@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yep, this is a product from Eastern Europe, our public institutions have decades worth of files in Microsoft’s formats that we still work with on daily basis and that nobody will ever rewrite from scratch. It’s not necessary to support every new feature, but opening stuff from 2000s and 2010s and saving it without compatibility issues is like mandatory if you want to ship an office application here. It’s understandable that a company targeting our local markets prioritized OOXML and not ODF. I do hope the Western fork puts more effort into the open format now though.

    • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because every other option is objectively worse in one way or another.

      The only upside to other options is basically just a moral one. And at a point you kinda have to stop giving a damn about morals and just use what works if you don’t want to endlessly waste time and tax payer money.

      It just is what it is unfortunately.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Did you really just think and write “just” a moral option?

        And at a point you kinda have to stop giving a damn about morals and just use what works

        No. That’s how you get fascism.