N.B. misandry is not real because men are not systemically oppressed (uninternalize your reddit MRA today: men suffer some drawbacks under the patriarchy but ultimately still maintain it due to the large amount of privileges they receive under it!)

  • AutomatedPossum [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    For starters, you’re really good at immediately trying to silence women criticizing the patriarchy and centering yourself in a conversation about the systemic opression of women. I’d hazard a guess that traditional concepts of masculinity where men have to be the strong stoics working through every problem on their own at least contribute to your problems, but in spite of patriarchy having harmed you that badly, you still run to its defense in the expected ways like the good pupper you are.

      • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not one of those “I am defending patriarchy” moments.

        Its more the conditioned response of “what about me, a [member of the dominant group]?” whenever liberation or the conditions of the oppressed are being discussed.

        It is in effect a defense of patriarchy, regardless of the benevalence of intentions of the poster.

        Notice that, even here on Hexbear, the conversation is centered on whether misandry is real rather than ways to tackle the problems of systemic violence against women.

        • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          i still don’t understand how it’s doing a defense of patriarchy. i’m not even bringing edge’s intention into it. he asked about himself in reply to a comment that was already about the suffering of men under patriarchy so i’m not even sure it was derailing the way we usually mean talking about men making discussions about feminism about themselves.

          Notice that, even here on Hexbear, the conversation is centered on whether misandry is real rather than ways to tackle the problems of systemic violence against women.

          The OP is about these ideas not being equal, the way the tweet is written takes misandry for granted and rightly says they are not equivalent. We don’t organize on here, the “what is to be done” kinda shit is basic stuff that everybody already knows like the men here not themselves doing violence, yelling at people we should probably stop being friends with, and running our orgs so it doesn’t happen (or holding them accountable if necessary) and there’s not really any conversation to have there unless someone has a specific question about running orgs or deradicalizing someone.

          • Moonworm [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            i still don’t understand how it’s doing a defense of patriarchy

            It’s reaffirming the centrality of men, that he, as a man, has to be considered in his particular case as a matter of course in this discussion. You might disagree and think that it was an appropriate place for such a question; however, there is also an implicit refutation of the claim that men are trained to inflict suffering by asking how he has been if he never leaves his house. It’s honestly kind of a non-sequitur; you don’t have to be engaged in inflicting suffering to have been trained to do so.