The fediverse is discussing if we should defederate from Meta’s new Threads app. Here’s why I probably won’t (for now).

(Federation between plume and my lemmy instance doesn’t work correctly at the moment, otherwise I would have made this a proper crosspost)

  • JoJo@social.fossware.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    And for people that want the fediverse to stay small, that would be fine. For those coming from very large sites like Twitter or Reddit, it often will not be because the value of those sites comes from the size of their networks.

    It won’t kill the fediverse but it might kill the various dying-mega-site migrations. For some that will be welcome. For others, not so much.

    There isn’t a one-size fits all here. The biggest danger is the fediverse devolving into a paranoid war of words solely because some people think there should be.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I came from Reddit, and personally I would rather see slow growth rather than having the fediverse dominated by Facebook.

      I am an associate member of the FSF though so there’s a sort of purist bias that isn’t there with most Redditors 🙃

      I understand where you’re coming from, though. People resist change, and so people coming from monolithic platforms are more likely to want another monolithic platform.

      • JoJo@social.fossware.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it’s that people want a monolithic platform? They just want a network that is big enough to provide enough new, high quality content to keep them amused/informed.

        Back in the day this was a constant struggle for bulletin boards (the best of which were focused on a particular hobby or area of interest). Too small and the place was dead, often with a lot of poor quality content with no one around to correct it. Too big and it became impossible to moderate, and difficult to keep track of who was reliable and who was full of shit, and difficult to find what you were interested in if a handful of threads took off and pushed everything else out of sight.

        After BBs mostly died, I used Twitter and Reddit as newsfeeds with informed commentary attached, plus bonus cute animal content. Mastodon and Lemmy/Kbin aren’t (yet) big enough to fulfill that role. Not enough of the commenters and sites I want to read stuff from are on it, and there are too few users to rely on to fill the gap.

        At work, we want to switch. We use Mastodon and Twitter atm. But there are not (yet) enough specialists in our field in the fediverse for it to work. A small fediverse just can’t do the job we need it to do. (FWIW we’re public sector researchers; this is about disseminating research and finding collaborators, not advertising products.)

        There is no one size fits all and neither should there be. The danger is that the small-is-good parts of the fediverse disappear because the content devolves to endless bitching about what other instances should have done and why won’t they all agree with us (even though we’re not a monolith, honest).

        • tenth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thats the nice thing about fediverse. People with different opinions can co-exist and they have freedom to choose what they want

          Big enough is nice but I’d rather have a small community without anything to do with the big tech.