Eugenics? What eugenics? There is no mention of eugenics in this research paper. smuglord Just the eco-fascist narrative that climate change isn’t caused by capitalism, but by too many people consuming resources faster than they can be replenished. I’m sure that’s not a dangerous idea useful to anyone or anything. clueless

It’s obvious no serious discussion can be had here. maybe-later-honey

      • Raphaël A. Costeau@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But it would be fun if enough people began using something like this and the AI began just randomly spouting out CC licenses.

        I do it because of that, but I suppose that other people that do that really believe in law or something like that.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • BountifulEggnog [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It really does, and fundamentally isn’t how copyright works either. If it was protected by the license as copywritable (which I really doubt), no license means to permission to use in any way (outside of exclusions, which to be fair to LLM folks these models might be included). Attaching a license only makes it further permissive, not less. If they can train on my comments they can train on theirs, and if they can’t train on my comments there are now more ways for someone to train on their comment.

          But :shrug-outta-hecks: if they want to cc all their comments whatever.

    • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not too well versed in US copyright law, but there’s a considerable degree of harmonisation across borders with intellectual property and I’m fairly confident that it’s perfectly legal for anyone to use short quotations for any purpose with or without a license.